eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2021
vol. 53
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

A systematic approach to transoesophageal echocardiography in the intensive care unit – a practical guide for intensivists

Wojciech Mielnicki
1, 2
,
Agnieszka Dyla
1, 2
,
Justyna Małyszek-Tumidajewicz
2

  1. Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, District Hospital in Olawa, Poland
  2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac and Lung Transplantation, Mechanical Circulatory Support, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2021; 53, 4: 329–335
Online publish date: 2021/07/23
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) has become a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in critical care settings, especially when transthoracic echocardiography is difficult to perform. It provides valuable information regarding mechanical ventilation, in obese patients, and in patients with surgical dressings and chest tubes. It is also feasible to perform TOE in a prone positioning [1, 2]. It allows visualization of deep cardiac structures and certain pathologies, including valve morphology, endocarditis, and patent foramen ovale, with better sensitivity than transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). It also makes it possible to visualize the superior vena cava, which can be useful in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients [1, 3, 4]. In addition, it is superior to TTE for the diagnosis of aortic dissection [1, 5], left atrial thrombus, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) canula position [1, 6].

Critical care TOE is said to have extensive diagnostic implications. In a review of 20 studies in 2508 patients, TOE had a diagnostic impact in 67.2% of cases [1, 7]. It also has a substantial therapeutic impact leading to treatment changes in between 38% [8] and 79% of cases [9]. TOE is also safe to perform in critically ill patients, with a complication rate of 2.6% [7] reported in 2508 patients. No major complications were reported in a series of 152 TOE exasiminations performed by fellows [7, 10].

This article describes a systematic approach to critical care TOE examination with a detailed description of views necessary for rapid haemodynamic assessment in intensive care patients. It is concordant with the European Diploma in Advanced Echocardiography (EDEC) requirements, and its structural approach is based on the author’s experience acquired in the EDEC examination process.

EDEC is part of an educational program endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). It is a curriculum in Echocardiography offered by ESICM to practitioners who have acquired a basic level of competence in critical care echocardiography (CCE) and would like to extend their competences to an advanced level.

According to the American Society of Echocardiography, there are 28 standard views often accompanied by Doppler measurements [10, 11]. TOE examination in critically ill patients has not yet been formally standardized. An extended TOE protocol (including non-standard views) in comprehensive TOE examinations carried out by cardiologists is not essential to achieve the goals defined by intensivists. The purpose of critical care TOE is to evaluate haemodynamically unstable patients [10]. The key is to develop a systematic approach to TOE examination and perform it in a repeatable sequence. The TOE examination presented in this article is based on “international consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography” (Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU) [12]. When performed for the first time, it consists of all views essential to diagnose the patient and, when performed at subsequent examinations, it encompasses views necessary to monitor changes in the patient’s status. The figures presented in the following paragraph were selected due to their value for haemodynamic monitoring in patients in shock states.

CRITICAL CARE TRANSOESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VIEWS

We present critical care TOE examination in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 is divided into 3 sections: how to obtain the view, exemplary findings and pathologies, and how we can use these views for haemodynamic assessment. Table 2 describes aorta visualization.

TABLE 1

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) views based on Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography [12]

How to obtain the viewUse this view to diagnoseHaemodynamic assessment
Mid-oesophageal ascending aorta short-axis view (SAX) (20–25 cm)
Insert the probe to ME to find four chamber viewMassive pulmonary embolus1) Fluid responsiveness in mechanically
(4CH) and withdraw the probe with anteflexionAscending aorta pathology (e.g. dilatation,ventilated patients
till you see AV in the centre of image (“Mercedes”aneurysm, dissection)a) Move SVC to the centre of image and rotate
sign) and continue to withdraw: the image willVascular catheters iv SVCthe omniplane to 90°, measure respiratory
be lost and then it will reappearvariations of SVC diameter during mechanical
(Figure 1)ventilation using M-Mode:
ΔSVC = (SV Cmax– SV Cmin)/SV Cmax
(Figure 2)
b) Using pulsed wave Doppler signal, place
sampling volume just above pulmonic valve
and assess respiratory variations of maximal
velocity (V max) and VTI
2) Assessing cardiac output:
RVOT VTI assessment as a surrogate of cardiac
output measurement, especially when VTI
of LVOT difficult to obtain (not validated)
Mid-oesophageal aortic valve SAX
Insert the probe to ME to find 4CH and withdrawAV pathologies (e.g. endocarditis, AVR, bicuspid
the probe till you see AV in 5CH and rotatevalve)
the omniplane to 30–45°LA assessment (e.g. enlargement, thrombus)
Position the AV in the centre with 3 cusps visibleAS defect
Mid-oesophageal right ventricle inflow-outflow
From ME AV SAX rotate the omniplane to 60–75°TV and PV pathologies (e.g. insufficiency,
and optimize TV and PV in the imageendocarditis)
RVOT pathologies
Mid-oesophageal Bicaval
Insert the probe to the ME to find 4CH and turnRA pathologies (thrombus, enlargement,Fluid responsiveness: place M-mode
the probe right to put the RA in the centrespontaneous contrast)perpendicular to the SVC and measure
of the screenAS (PFO, aneurysm, ASD)respirophasic changes of SVC diameter
Rotate the omniplane to 90° to imageVenous catheter position
simultaneously IVC on the left and SVCECLS/ECMO cannula position
on the rightLines, wires position
Mid-oesophageal 4-chamber view (4CH) (30–35 cm)
Insert the probe to the ME till you image 4CHRWMATwo-dimensional (2D): LV contractility
(0–10°). Optimize the apex by slight retroflexionLV hypertrophy(antero-lateral wall, infero-septal wall, apex),
of the probeRV dilatation, overloadRV contractility (free wall), RV/LV assessment
(Figure 3)Paradoxical septal motion(diameter, area, volume) to look for signs
of acute RV pressure overload, assessment
of pericardial effusion
Colour Doppler: MV and TV pathologies
Pulsed Doppler: mitral inflow pattern, measure
E and A wave and calculate E/A, combine with
tissue Doppler to assess lateral e’ and s’
Mid-oesophageal 2-chamber (2CH)
Insert the probe to the ME till you image 4CHRWMATwo-dimensional (2D): LV contractility (anterior
view, rotate the omniplane to 90° and retroflexLV hypertrophywall, inferior wall)
the probe to visualize LV with apex and LAColor Doppler: MV pathology
Pulsed Doppler: mitral inflow pattern, measure E
and A and calculate E/A
Mid-oesophageal aortic valve long-axis (LAX)
Insert the probe to visualize AV in SAX (30–45°)Aortic root assessmentTwo-dimensional (2D): LV contractility
and rotate the omniplane to 120° to visualize AVLVOT assessment (e.g. diameter measurement,(anterior septum wall, inferior posterior wall),
in long axisVS hypertrophyLVOT diameter measurement for cardiac output
(Figure 4)MV pathologies (MR, MS, endocarditis)calculation
Colour Doppler: AV disease, MV disease
Transgastric mid short-axis view (40–45 cm)
Insert the probe to the stomach till you see liverRWMATwo-dimensional 2D: LV contractility (anterior,
on the screen, anteflex the probe and centreLV hypertrophyseptal, inferior, lateral walls), signs of acute RV
LV with papillary muscles in the centre of theRV dilatation, overloadpressure overload (flattened septum, LV not
image, omniplane 0°Paradoxical septal motionspherical)
(Figure 5)Fractional area change (FAC) measurement
FAC = (LVEDA – LVESA)/LVEDA LVEDA – left ventricle end-diastolic area
LVESA – left ventricle end-systolic area
Transgastric long-axis view
Insert the probe to the stomach and optimizeAortic valve pathologies (e.g. endocarditis,Two-dimensional 2D: LV contractility
the image to acquire transgastric mid SAX, andsclerosis)(anteroseptal wall, inferolateral wall)
rotate the omniplane to 110–120° to visualizeColour Doppler: MR and AV pathologies
LVOT and AV on the right side of the screenPulsed Doppler:
(Figure 6)a) measurement of VTI velocity change in LVOT
(ΔVA)
ΔVA= (V maxA – VminA)/V maxA
V maxA– maximal velocity measured in LVOT
V minA– minimal velocity measured in LVOT
b) measurement of VTI change measured in LVOT
(ΔVTI) during passive leg raising test (PLR)
Deep transgastric long-axis view
Insert the probe to the stomach – omniplaneAortic valve pathologies (e.g. endocarditis,Two-dimensional 2D: LV contractility
0°, from mid or apical TG SAX views anteflex andsclerosis)Colour Doppler: MR and AV pathologies
slowly advance the probe until the LV apexPulsed Doppler:
is seen at the top of the displaya) measurement of VTI velocity change in
LVOT (ΔVA)
ΔVA= (V maxA – V minA)/V maxA
V maxA– maximal velocity measured in LVOT
V minA – minimal velocity measured in LVOT
b) measurement of VTI change measured in LVOT
(ΔVTI) during passive leg raising test (PLR)

[i] MO – mid oesophagus, TG – trasgastric, 4CH – 4-chamber view, 5Ch – 5-chamber view, LV – left ventricle, RV – right ventricle, SVC – superior vena cava, IVC – inferior vena cava, AV – aortic valve, MV – mitral valve, TV – tricuspid valve, PV – pulmonic valve, AS – atrial septum, VS – ventricle septum, PFO – patent foramen ovale, VTI – volume time integral, RVOT – right ventricle outflow track, LVOT – left ventricle outflow track, RWMA – regional wall motion abnormality

TABLE 2

Aorta visualisation in critical care transoesophageal echocardiography

ViewHow to obtain the viewUSE For
Mid-oesophageal ascending aorta SAXAlready described in first paragraph
Mid-oesophageal ascending aorta LAXInsert the probe to ME and optimize the image to acquire ME ascending aorta SAX, then rotate the angle to 90° with aorta in the center of the screen in LAAortic pathology Pulmonary embolus in right PA
Mid-oesophageal descending aorta SAXInsert the probe to ME and turn the probe left till you find aorta, introduce and withdraw the probe to assess the descending aortaAortic pathology IABP position Left pleural effusion
Mid-oesophageal descending aorta LAXFrom ME descending aorta SAX turn the angle to 90–100° and visualize the descending aorta in LAXAortic pathology IABP position
Upper-oesophageal aortic arch SAXFrom ME descending aorta SAX withdraw the probe to visualize AA (0°), and then rotate the angle to 60–90° to acquire AA, PV and PA in viewAA pathology PV pathology
Upper-oesophageal aortic arch LAXFrom ME descending aorta SAX withdraw the probe to visualize AA (0°) and turn the probe slightly right, aorta changes its shape to ovalAA pathology

[i] AA – aortic arch, IABP – intra-aortic balloon pump, PA – pulmonary artery, PV – pulmonic valve

FIGURE 1

Mid-oesophageal ascending aorta short-axis view (SAX). Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: SVC – superior vena cava, PA – pulmonary artery, RPA – right pulmonary artery, AscAo – ascending aorta

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g001_min.jpg
FIGURE 2

M-mode assessment of SVC collapsibility. Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: SVC – superior vena cava, RPA – right pulmonary artery

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g002_min.jpg
FIGURE 3

Mid-oesophageal 4-chamber view. Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: LA – left atrium, RA – right atrium, RV – right ventricle, LV – left ventricle

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g003_min.jpg
FIGURE 4

Mid-oesophageal aortic valve long-axis (LAX). Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: LA – left atrium, LV – left ventricle, RV – right ventricle, AscAo – ascending aorta

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g004_min.jpg
FIGURE 5

Transgastric mid SAX. Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: LV – left ventricle, RV – right ventricle

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g005_min.jpg
FIGURE 6

Transgastric LAX. PW – doppler through LVOT for VTI assessment. Anatomic structures indicated by arrows: LV – left ventricle, Ao – ascending aorta

/f/fulltexts/AIT/44766/AIT-53-44766-g006_min.jpg

Critical care TOE has evolved to become one of the most versatile modalities for diagnosing and guiding the treatment of critically ill patients [7]. It is less frequently performed in the ICU settings [13] compared to TTE. Nevertheless, TOE possesses many unique properties of an “ideal” haemodynamic tool [6, 14]. Vignon et al. [6] described 10 reasons to perform TOE in the ICU setting. It allows good visualization of heart structures and vessels not hampered by some TTE limitations (e.g. emphysema, high PEEP level in mechanically ventilated patients, obesity, fluid overload, dressings, and drains). TOE is a reliable source of information on the mechanism of circulatory failure (e.g. cardiac tamponade, thrombus in the proximal pulmonary arteries consistent with massive pulmonary embolism, etc.). In septic shock, it provides information on the main mechanism of circulatory failure, such as hypovolaemia, vasoplegia, and left or right ventricular systolic failure [6, 14]. TOE allows reproducible and sequential haemodynamic assessments and helps to predict fluid responsiveness [6]. Haemodynamic assessment, predicting fluid responsiveness, and finding the cause of shock are the main domains of critical care echocardiography. A clinician has to assess the patient quickly and decide on the treatment process; thus, goal-directed critical care TOE is often applied. Benjamin et al. [16] described goal-directed TOE with the use of 4 views. Vieillard-Baron et al. [17] described septic shock patients who had daily therapy guided by TOE. The typical views were as follows: mid-oesophageal 4-chamber view, transgastric midpapillary muscle view, and mid-oesophageal bicaval view for SVC assessment. This limited approach is especially useful for haemodynamic assessment and response to treatment [10]. The views described in this article are based on the “international consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography” [12]. The clinician can use any combination of views to answer the clinical question. We present critical care TOE in a table, with a short description of how to acquire the view, how to use it, and what views are most helpful for haemodynamic assessment. It is not our goal to describe all the pathologies found when performing TOE examination. Clinicians interested in the subject of pathologies assessed in TOE are referred to detailed articles [7, 10, 18]. We present only 1 method of view acquisition that we found to be easy and reproducible. At times, it is necessary to use different views or omniplanes to identify a cardiac structure or to make reliable measurements. Because critical care patients have multiple cardiac problems, cooperation with the cardiology department is very important in the field of valvular assessment, regional wall motion abnormalities, and qualification for invasive procedures. Establishing close relations with cardiology, cardiac surgery, and cardiac anaesthesia departments improves the diagnostic and treatment process of critically ill patients [6]. This article is dedicated to critical care physicians who possess some knowledge in echocardiography and who want to get ready for the EDEC examination. It is constructed as a brief curriculum and cannot be used as the sole source of information required for the exam. Acquiring competence in this technique has become part of the critical care training curriculum and is recommended by critical care societies [12].

Critical care TOE has a lot in common with critical care TTE. Many image planes are similar, but the only difference is the presentation on the screen. The manner of conducting the cardiac evaluation is the same, and haemodynamic assessment is based on Doppler measurements. The complete discussion on both methods is presented in a 2-part series in CHEST [10, 19, 20].

The main difference between these techniques is the method of image acquisition. In critical care TOE, the intensivist learns how to handle the probe introduced into the oesophagus or stomach [10]. In general, in TOE, the transducer is closer to the heart structures and thus produces a better image resolution. One consistent failure of TOE is the measurement of tricuspid regurgitation with Doppler due to the difficulty in achieving a Doppler angle. In the measurement of TR, TTE is recommended [10]. TOE is chosen over TTE when the physician cannot acquire good image quality with TTE, especially in mechanically ventilated patients – when there is an urgent need to determine the cause of haemodynamic instability. TOE can be performed in less than 15 minutes, it is less operator dependent than TTE [6, 21], and probe manipulation is actually easier with TOE than with TTE because the probe is well-positioned simply by being in the oesophagus [10]. Although it might be easier to perform TOE after a certain level of training, competence in TTE should precede the competence in TOE.

There are different data regarding the number of studies required to achieve competence in critical care TOE. Charron et al. [22] state that 31 studies under supervision are sufficient for competent acquisition [10]. The advanced critical care statement [12] requires a minimum of 35 studies of good quality. It also states that more studies might be required if the quality is not optimal [10]. Thirty-five TOE examinations are also required to fulfil the criteria for the European Diploma in Advanced Echocardiography (EDEC) examination process. EDEC requires the trainee to be supervised by a cardiologist and intensivist who have mastered the knowledge of advanced critical care echocardiography. As far as TTE is concerned, a minimum of 100 studies is required to achieve a sufficient level of competence to perform TTE without supervision [12]. It is optimal for an intensivist to work with a cardiologist during training. This provides expert assistance in image acquisition and interpretation.

Critical care TOE is a minimally invasive procedure and can be safely performed in the ICU setting. Critical care patients are very often sedated and mechanically ventilated so that the introduction of a probe can be safely performed with a laryngoscope. The patient is well-monitored, and any change in their condition can be quickly identified. Critical care TOE is safe with a low complication rate (2.6%). The most commonly reported complications were circulatory disturbances, such as hypo- or hypertension, superficial mucous lesions, hypoxaemia, arrhythmias, and dislodgement of nasogastric or nasojejunal tubes [7, 18]. However, complications of TOE performed in the emergency department were more frequent than in the ICU. In one series of 142 emergency department TOEs, there were 18 complications (12.6%): respiratory insufficiency/failure (7), emesis (4), hypotension (3), agitation (2), death (1), and cardiac dysrhythmia (1) [23].

Critical care TOE is contraindicated in active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, perforated viscus, and oesophageal pathologies: laceration, perforation, stricture, tumour, and diverticulum. Relative contraindications encompass the following: history of neck and mediastinum radiation, previous GI surgery and bleeding, Barrett’s oesophagus, history of dysphagia, restriction of neck motility, symptomatic hiatal hernia, oesophageal varices, coagulopathy, thrombocytopaenia, active oesophagitis, and active peptic ulcer disease [10, 17]. We strongly encourage intensivists to perform critical care TOE on a regular basis, keeping in mind its limitations and contraindications. Advances in technology, such as miniaturized probes, 3D-ultrasound, and automatic flow measurement, will expand the role of TOE in critical care. It does not replace other techniques of advanced haemodynamic monitoring. It provides different information compared to pulmonary artery catheter or thermodilution indicator technique, and thus the methods are not competitive but complementary [18].

The systematic approach to critical care TOE examination presented in this article can be helpful in acquiring basic skills to learn this technique.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a structural approach to TOE exa-mination in critically ill patients. Performing TOE in an organized fashion will help to pinpoint most of the pathologies and monitor the treatment process. TOE is a quick, easy, and operator-independent dia-gnostic method, which can be successfully taught in any intensive care unit.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Financial support and sponsorship

none.

Conflict of interest

none.

References

1 

Boissier F, Bagate F, Mekontso Dessap A. Hemodynamic monitoring using trans esophageal echocardiography in patients with shock. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 791. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-23.

2 

Mekontso Dessap A, Proost O, Boissier F, Louis B, Roche Campo F, Brochard L. Transesophageal echocardiography in prone position during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 430-434. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2114-z.

3 

Pedersen WR, Walker M, Olson JD, et al. Value of transesophageal echocardiography as an adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography in evaluation of native and prosthetic valve endocarditis. Chest 1991; 100: 351-356. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.2.351.

4 

Shively BK, Gurule FT, Roldan CA, Leggett JH, Schiller NB. Diagnostic value of transesophageal compared with transthoracic echocardiography in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 391-397. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90591-v.

5 

Willens HJ, Kessler KM. Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of diseases of the thoracic aorta: part 1. Aortic dissection, aortic intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the aorta. Chest 1999; 116: 1772-1779. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1772.

6 

Vignon P, Merz TM, Vieillard-Baron A. Ten reasons for performing hemodynamic monitoring using transesophageal echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 1048-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4716-1.

7 

Hüttemann E, Schelenz C, Kara F, Chatzinikolaou K, Reinhart K. The use and safety of transoesophageal echocardiography in the gene-ral ICU–a minireview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 827-836. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00423.x.

8 

Garcia YA, Quintero L, Singh K, et al. Feasibility, safety, and utility of advanced critical care transesophageal echocardiography performed by pulmonary/critical care fellows in a medical ICU. Chest 2017; 152: 736-741. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.029.

9 

Arntfield R, Lau V, Landry Y, Priestap F, Ball I. Impact of critical care transesophageal echocardiography in medical-surgical ICU patients: characteristics and results from 274 consecutive examinations. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 35: 896-902. doi: 10.1177/0885066618797271.

10 

Mayo PH, Narasimhan M, Koenig S. Critical care transesophageal echocardiography. Chest 2015; 148: 1323-1332. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0260.

11 

Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 921-964. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.009.

12 

Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 654-666. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3228-5.

13 

Zieleskiewicz L, Muller L, Lakhal K, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound in intensive care units: assessment of 1073 procedures in a multicentric, prospective, observational study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1638-1647. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3952-5.

14 

Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, et al. Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring–a consensus of 16. Crit Care Lond Engl 2011; 15: 229. doi: 10.1186/cc10291.

15 

Aneman A, Vieillard-Baron A. Cardiac dysfunction in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 2073-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4503-4.

16 

Benjamin E, Griffin K, Leibowitz AB, et al. Goal-directed transeso-phageal echocardiography performed by intensivists to assess left ventricular function: comparison with pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 10-15. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(98)90048-9.

17 

Vieillard-Baron A, Caille V, Charron C, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Actual incidence of global left ventricular hypokinesia in adult septic shock. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 1701-1706. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318174db05.

18 

Hüttemann E. Transoesophageal echocardiography in critical care. Minerva Anestesiol 2006; 72: 891-913.

19 

Narasimhan M, Koenig SJ, Mayo PH. Advanced echocardiography for the critical care physician: part 1. Chest 2014; 145: 129-134. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2441.

20 

Narasimhan M, Koenig S, Mayo PH. Advanced echocardiography for the critical care physician: part 2. Chest 2014; 145: 135-142. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2442.

21 

Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1795-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.

22 

Charron C, Prat G, Caille V, et al. Validation of a skills assessment scoring system for transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of hemodynamics. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1712-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0801-1.

23 

Gendreau MA, Triner WR, Bartfield J. Complications of transesophageal echocardiography in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17: 248-251. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90117-1.

This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.