eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
5/2023
vol. 55
 
Share:
Share:
Letter to the Editor

Enteral nutrition-related small bowel bezoar: a case report and literature review

Natalia Daniela Llobera
1
,
Mariana Toffolo Pasquini
1
,
Maria Jimena Reberendo
1
,
Sebastian Pablo Chapela
1
,
Rafael Maurette
1

  1. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2023; 55, 5: 377–381
Online publish date: 2023/12/30
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Dear Editor,

The primary indication for enteral nutrition is the inability to receive nutrients orally. A functional gastrointestinal system with adequate length and absorption capacity is required to provide enteral nutrition. In patients who have been identified as malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, nutritional supplementation is advised. Specific indications for enteral nutrition include alternated level of consciousness, oesophageal obstruction, swallowing disorders due to neurological diseases, cancer cachexia, anorexia, intestinal fistulas of low debit, intestinal surgery, chronic bowel disease malabsorption syndrome, and pancreatitis [1].

A bezoar is a rare enteral nutrition side effect. Most reports of this complication are in the oesophagus, some in the stomach, and rarely in the small bowel. Concomitant factors of this complication are the use of drugs such as proton-pump inhibitors and sucralfate or nasogastric tube misplacement. There is no description of small bowel bezoar with concomitant use of octreotide.

Herein we present a case of an enteral nutrition bezoar in the small bowel with concomitant use of octreotide in a patient undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) surgery.

Male, aged 61 years, with no pertinent medical history, with a recent pancreatic head tumour diagnosis, in the context of jaundice, acholia, and loss of 8 kg of body weight. PD, pancreatic-jejunal anastomosis, and duodeno-entero anastomosis were performed. Before finishing the procedure, a k-108 nasojejunal catheter was placed. In the immediate postoperative period, in the intensive care unit (ICU), it evolved with septic shock requiring mechanical ventilation, vaso-active drugs, and empiric antimicrobial agents. Enterobacter cloacae and E. faecalis were found in intraoperative cultures, and direct antimicrobial therapy was implemented.

In the immediate postoperative period, octreotide was started at 200 µg a day. Also, parenteral nutrition with a 3-chamber bag was initiated. After 48 hours, the requirement of vasoactive drugs and lactate levels decreased, and enteral nutrition was started. Polymeric and 1 kcal mL–1 and 40 gr L–1 without fibre formula was chosen and started at 21 mL h–1. On day 5 after surgery, with no feeding intolerance, the formula was changed to 1.5 kcal mL–1 and 100 g mL–1 of proteins with soluble fibre, and the infusion rate was increased to 63 mL h–1. Parenteral nutrition was stopped.

Also, on day 5 after surgery a computed tomography (CT) scan was made which showed a parietal oedema of the pancreatic anastomosis loop and perihepatic free fluid that, at the gallbladder bed, was partially loculated with isolated bubbles of pneumoperitoneum. On postoperative day 6, with the patient haemodynamically stable, 30 mg of octreotide long-acting release was given i.m. Later, on day 7, the patient showed fever, and an abdominal collection was drained percutaneously under tomographic guidance.

Finally, on day 8 the patient evolved with an acute abdomen, so he was admitted to the operating room. A highly dilated small intestine was found. It was observed that the cause of the intestinal obstruction was the content of the consolidated enteral diet in the form of a hard paste, such as an extensive mould. Due to this obstruction, the biliary anastomosis loop was highly dilated and obstructed, causing an anastomotic leak on the anterior surface through the suture line. Due to this great dilation of the thin, a leak was also found in the lateral border of the enteroanastomosis duodenum. An enterotomy was performed in the distal ileum, distal to the consolidated food mould, all the consolidated enteral food was extracted, and it was decided to perform the entire duodeno-entero anastomosis again; in addition, a minimal enterectomy was performed dismantling the duodeno-entero anastomosis (Figure 1). The patient returned to the ICU with refractory shock and died the next day.

FIGURE 1

Surgical removal of small bower bezoar. Consolidated enteral diet, as a hard paste, was extracted from the ileum

/f/fulltexts/AIT/52223/AIT-55-52223-g001_min.jpg

A bezoar is an indigestible mass that becomes stuck in the digestive system. Many substances, including fibres, the skins and seeds of fruits and vegetables, hair, medicines, and caseinate protein, can combine to form this indigestible mass. The most common place to find bezoars is the stomach, but they can be found in all the digestive tract [2].

Enteral nutrition bezoar is an uncommon complication of enteral nutrition. Most of the cases presented in the literature are related to nasogastric tube misplacement (Table 1). A case of nasogastric tube misplacement and oesophageal bezoar was reported in a 20-year-old male with meningoencephalitis and prolonged enteral feeding. It was resolved by removing the tube and washing the oesophagus with bicarbonate solution [3]. The use of pancreatic enzymes for the dissolution of the bezoar was also described [4, 5]. In another case, a 69-year-old woman was under mechanical ventilation after cardiac arrest, receiving enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube; after misplacement of the tube, the reinsertion was difficult [6]. An endoscopy was performed, and an oesophageal bezoar was diagnosed. Due to the terminal condition of the patient, it was not removed and a jejunostomy was performed [6]. Also, the case of a 74-year-old with myocardial infarction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with long hospital stay was reported, in whom, after tube misplacement, reinsertion was difficult. Endoscopic diagnosis of an oesophageal bezoar was made, and mechanical endoscopic treatment was performed [7]. In an instance involving an 80-year-old woman with chronic mechanical ventilation in a long-term facility and enteral nutrition with a ready-to-use formula and protein supplement, after tube misplacement, reinsertion was again difficult [8]. Endoscopic diagnosis of an 18-cm oesophageal bezoar was made, and endoscopic fragmentation was performed, and the rest was pushed to the stomach [8]. In all the cases, after the tube misplacement, the reinsertion was difficult, being this an early sign that could alert physicians. But in a case report of an oesophageal bezoar, the solidification only encircled the tube, and only the change of the tube for a new one was needed [9]. Table 1 shows the oesophageal bezoars reported in the literature. Finally, Caldeira et al. [10] published a retrospective study with 1003 ICU patients with enteral nutrition, and 9 of them had oesophageal impactation of enteral nutrition, it was also shown that 7 of them had oesophageal reflux risk factors. Seven individuals responded favourably to the endoscopic therapy. Also, it was observed that the average time of impact of enteral feeding was 12 days after the beginning of enteral feeding [10].

TABLE 1

Case reports of oesophageal bezoars and different treatment approaches

Author, year of publication [Ref.]Patient conditionConcomitant
medication
Length of enteral feeding (EN) before bezoarTreatment
Tawfic, 2012 [3]20-year-old man with meningoencephalitisPiperacillin-tazobactam, acyclovir, sodium valproate, levetiracetam, omeprazoleTwo and a half monthsEndoscopic washing with bicarbonate solution
Gil-Almagro, 2015 [4]66-year-old man
in the intensive care unit for an extended period
Opioids intravenousThree monthsPancreatic enzymes
Bouwyn, 2011 [12]67-year-old patient with septic shockLactuloseSeven daysPancreatic enzymes
Degheili, 2017 [6]69-year-old woman with cardiac arrestNot reportedNot reportedNone
Krupp, 1995 [7]74-year-old man with myocardial infarctionAluminium hydroxide gel
and sucralfate
12 daysFlexible and rigid endoscopic fragmentation and pushing to the stomach
Marcus, 2010 [8]80-year-old woman with chronic mechanical ventilationFurosemide, levothyroxine, omeprazole, prednisone, carbidopa-levodopa,
amiodarone and subcutaneous insulin
Not reportedEndoscopic fragmentation and pushing to the stomach
García-Luna, 1997 [9]40-year-old woman with subarachnoid hemorrhageSucralfate, B complex vitamins, iron and magnesium salts, phenytoin, phenobarbital110 days of mechanical ventilation; length of EN not reportedChange of tube
61-year-old manSucralfate, vitamins B and C, iron42 days after admission; length of EN not reportedEndoscopic removal failed – total parenteral nutrition
66-year-old man with 35% body surface burnSucralfate, lactulose, vitamin complexesSeven daysReplacement of tube,
and 3 days later PEG
Cremer, 1996 [28]68-year-old man with myasthenia gravisPyridostigmine, prednisone, metoclopramide, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazoleSeven monthsNot reported
Katsanos, 2010 [29]Patient under mechanical ventilation with trauma and abdominal compartment syndrome with surgical treatment; no other data reportedPPINot reportedEndoscopic with a Roth net and sprayed with a mixture of Gastrografin
and N-acetylcysteine
Patient with stroke under mechanical ventilation;
no other data reported
PPINot reportedEndoscopic with a Roth net and sprayed with a mixture of Gastrografin
and N-acetylcysteine

[i] PEG – percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, PPI – proton pump inhibitor

Also, a non-oesophageal bezoar was reported in the case of gastric bezoar in a 58-year-old woman after cardiac arrest receiving enteral nutrition on day 28. The diagnosis was made with an abdominal X-ray that showed the stomach filled with calcifications [11]. A case of a diffuse bezoar in the stomach and small bowel was reported in a patient with legionella pneumonia with adult respiratory distress syndrome [12]. In this case the bezoar was attributed to the initiation of enteral nutrition during paralytic ileus after surgical treatment of alithiasic cholecystitis, the use of opioids, and the overlap between enteral nutrition and norepinephrine [12]. Also, a small bowel bezoar was reported in a 67-year-old male patient in the postoperative period after gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction and cholecystectomy, with enteral nutrition through a jejunostomy [13]. The patient needed surgery, denatured enteral formula was found proximal to the jejunostomy tube, and it was drained with a longitudinal incision of the jejunum [13]. Similarly, a 36-year-old pregnant woman with ovarian cancer needed a total gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction and cholecystectomy, and a jejunostomy tube was inserted [13]. Other places of enteral nutrition bezoar were reported, e.g. the caecum [14]. Table 2 shows cases of enteral nutrition non-oesophagus bezoars.

TABLE 2

Case reports of enteral nutrition bezoars in locations other than the oesophagus

Author and year of publicationPatient conditionLocation
of bezoar
Concomitant medicationLength of enteral feeding (EN) before bezoarTreatment
Enomoto, 2016 [11]58-year-old woman with cardiac arrestGastricNot reported21 daysCoca-Cola® through nasogastric tube
Bouwyn, 2012 [12]65-year-old man with pneumoniaGastric and small bowelNot reported46 daysSurgical
Dedes, 2006 [13]67-year-old man with gastrectomy and cholecystectomySmall bowelNot reported7 daysSurgical
36-year-old woman with ovarian cancer and gastrectomySmall bowelNot reported4 daysSurgical
Siddens, 2020 [15]70-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer and pancreaticoduodenectomySmall bowelLaxatives5 daysSurgical
O’Neil, 1996 [30]79-year-old with gastric adenocarcinoma
and gastrectomy
Small bowelNot reported7 daysPapain through the tube every
6 hours

A case of a small bowel bezoar with enteral feeding in a 70-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer who required a pancreaticoduodenectomy was published in 2020, like the present case. The diagnosis was made on day 5. The only concomitant medications reported were laxatives, and she was not under vasopressors. The patient needed surgery and was discharged home alive after 37 days [15]. The difference between this and the current case is that the patient was under vasopressors, with mechanical ventilation, and was receiving octreotide.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy, a complex abdominal surgery, is indicated in malignant tumours of pancreatic head, ampulla, periampullary, distal bile duct, benign tumours, trauma of pancreatic head and duodenum, as well as non-neoplastic conditions such as chronic pancreatitis [1620]. Due to the severity of the disease and the nutritional status in the postoperative period, most of the patients require nutritional support with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, or both [21]. The mortality rate of PD is below 5% in specialized centres, but it has high postoperative morbidity rates of up to 60%. Major postoperative complications include bile leak, pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying, postoperative haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion or reopening, abdominal abscess, wound infection, or dehiscence [16, 17, 19, 22, 23].

The rate of pancreatic fistula varies greatly between studies, ranging from 5 to 35% [16, 24, 25]. Most studies demonstrate that even high-output fistulas (those that produce more than 200 mL per day) can spontaneously shut with conservative therapy, while the closure rate is noticeably lower than that of low-output fistulas [16, 24, 25]. Conservative treatment consists of electrolyte replacement, fluid balance, parenteral nutritional support, if required, antibiotics in patients with sepsis signs or local inflammation, and drainage of intra-abdominal collections [17]. Furthermore, the use of somatostatin has been proposed because it increases the net absorption of water and electrolytes while inhibiting pancreatic exocrine, biliary, and small bowel discharges [2426]. Despite its benefits, somatostatin and its analogues have been shown in numerous studies to speed up fistula closure and decrease the discharge of digestive fistulas, but there is no solid evidence for higher closure rates compared with standard treatments [2426]. The short half-life of somatostatin has led to the development of several analogues. Due to octreotide’s 120-minute half-life, intermittent subcutaneous dose regimens are possible and were employed in the actual case. Colonic pharmaco-bezoar related with octreotide use was reported in a 79-year-old patient on the 14th day after cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant use of this drug [27]. Although it is not an enteral nutrition bezoar, this case is useful to exemplify a complication related to the use of octreotide.

As has been shown, enteral nutrition bezoar is an unusual complication of enteral nutrition. Several factors can increase the chance to generate it, such as nasogastric tube misplacement or concomitant use of drugs like sucralfate, opiates, norepinephrine, or, as in this case, somatostatin analogues. The use of new antacids has reduced the use of sucralfate, and multimodal analgesia has reduced the use of opiates. The aim of treatment is to remove the bezoar, because it may result gastric outlet obstruction, ileus, ulcerations due to pressure necrosis, and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding. Depending on the location of the bezoar, different strategies for removal can be implemented. As presented before, in oesophageal bezoars, endoscopic fragmentation and pushing to the stomach can be tried, and in small bowel bezoars, surgery is the solution. Also, other strategies have been described, including effervescent liquids (Coca-Cola®), N-acetylcysteine, Gastrografin spray, and pancreatic enzymes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Assistance with the article

none.

Financial support and sponsorship

none.

Conflicts of interest

none.

Presentation

none.

References

1 

Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 2017; 36: 623-650. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013.

2 

Iwamuro M, Okada H, Matsueda K, et al. Review of the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bezoars. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 336-345. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.336.

3 

Tawfic QA, Bhakta P, Date RR, Sharma PK. Esophageal bezoar formation due to solidification of enteral feed administered through a malpositioned nasogastric tube: Case report and review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica 2012; 50: 188-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.12.002.

4 

Gil-Almagro F, Carmona-Monge FJ. Oesophageal bezoar as a complication of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients. Two case studies. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2016; 32: 29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.08.003.

5 

Gupta R, Share M, Pineau BC. Dissolution of an esophageal bezoar with pancreatic enzyme extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 96-99. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.115318.

6 

Degheili JA, Sebaaly MG, Hallal AH. Nasogastric tube feeding-induced esophageal bezoar: case description. Case Rep Med 2017; 2017: 1365736. doi: 10.1155/2017/1365736.

7 

Krupp KB, Johns P, Troncoso V. Esophageal bezoar formation in a tube-fed patient receiving sucralfate and antiacid therapy: a case report. Gastroenterol Nurs 1995; 18: 46-48. doi: 10.1097/00001610-199503000-00002.

8 

Marcus EL, Arnon R, Sheynkman A, et al. Esopha-geal obstruction due to enteral feed bezoar: a case report and literature review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2: 352-356. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i10.352.

9 

García-Luna PP, García E, Pereira JL, et al. Eso-pha-geal obstruction by solidification of the enteral feed: A complication to be prevented. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 790-792. doi: 10.1007/s001340050412.

10 

Caldeira A, Casanova P, Sousa R, et al. Alimentação entérica e impactação alimentar esofágica: Que Relação? Acta Med Port 2010; 23: 183-190.

11 

Enomoto Y, Mizutani T, Ueda Y, et al. Enteral nutrient gel causes formation of a huge gastric bezoar. Acute Med Surg 2017; 4: 140-141. doi: 10.1002/ams2.223.

12 

Bouwyn JP, Clavier T, Eraldi JP, et al. Diffuse digestive bezoar: a rare and severe complication of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 730-731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2428-5.

13 

Dedes KJ, Schiesser M, Schäfer M, Clavien PA. Postoperative bezoar ileus after early enteral feeding. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.04.010.

14 

McIvor AC, Meguid MM, Curtas S, Warren J, Kaplan DS. Intestinal obstruction from cecal bezoar; a complication of fiber-containing tube feedings. Nutrition 1990; 6: 115-117.

15 

Siddens ED, Al-Habbal Y, Bhandari M. Gastrointestinal obstruction secondary to enteral nutrition bezoar: a case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12: 369-376. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.369.

16 

Karim SAM, Abdulla KS, Abdulkarim QH, et al. The outcomes and complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): cross sectional study. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 383-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.041.

17 

Schorn S, Demir IE, Vogel T, et al. Mortality and postoperative complications after different types of surgical reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy–a systematic review with meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2019; 404: 141-157. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01762-5.

18 

Leichtle SW, Kaoutzanis C, Mouawad NJ, et al. Classic Whipple versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the ACS NSQIP. J Surg Res 2013; 183: 170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.016.

19 

Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo C, Lillemoe HS, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 430-438. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199305010-00002.

20 

Simon R. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin N Am 2021; 101: 865-874. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.06.011.

21 

Lassen K, Coolsen MME, Slim K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 817-830. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.011.

22 

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postope-rative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

23 

Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Bene-duce AA, Di Carlo V. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1387-1393. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6324.

24 

Gans SL, Van Westreenen HL, Kiewiet JJS, Ra-uws EAJ, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. Systema-tic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 754-760. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8709.

25 

Gayral F, Campion JP, Regimbeau JM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the efficacy of lanreotide 30 mg PR in the treatment of pancreatic and enterocutaneous fistulae. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 872-877. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b2489f.

26 

Li-Ling J, Irving M. Somatostatin and octreotide in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic complications and the treatment of enterocutaneous pancreatic fistulas: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 190-199. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01659.x.

27 

Gillion JF, Jullès MC, Deyme JP, Chollet JM, Lagneau M, Sirieix D. Pharmaco-bézoar après duodénopancréatectomie céphalique, association Choléstyramine + antisécrétoires: situation à risque en chirurgie pancréatique? J Chir (Paris) 2008; 145: 64-66. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(08)70306-5.

28 

Cremer EA, Gelfand DW. Esophageal bezoar resulting from enteral feedings. J Parenter Enter Nutr 1996; 20: 371-373. doi: 10.1177/01486071-96020005371.

29 

Katsanos KH, Koulouras V, Nakos G, Tsianos EV. Successful management of full-length obstructing esophageal bezoars in an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1280-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1791-y.

30 

O’Neil HK, Hibbeln JF, Resnick DJ, Bass EM, Aizenstein RI. Intestinal obstruction by a bezoar from tube feedings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1477-1478. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956580.

This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.