|
2/2024
vol. 20
Review paper
Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention
Piotr P. Buszman
1, 5, 6
,
- Department of Cardiology, Collegium Medicum, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
- Students’ Scientific Group at the Second Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Academy of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
- Department of Cardiology, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biała, Poland
- Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Katowice, Poland
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20, 2 (76): 124–132
Online publish date: 2024/06/17
Get citation
1. McKiernan M, Halkos ME. Hybrid coronary revascularization: are we there yet? Curr Opin Cardiol 2020; 35: 673-8. 2.
Kiaii B, Teefy P. Hybrid coronary artery revascularization: a review and current evidence. Innovations (Phila) 2019; 14: 394-404. 3.
Saha T, Naqvi SY, Goldberg S. Hybrid revascularization: a review. Cardiology 2018; 140: 35-44. 4.
Hannan EL, Wu YF, Cozzens K, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease. J Geriatr Cardiol 2021; 18: 159-67. 5.
Ganyukov V, Kochergin N, Shilov A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of surgical vs. percutaneous vs. hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease: residual myocardial ischemia and clinical outcomes at one year-Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS). J Interv Cardiol 2020; 2020: 5458064. 6.
Ganyukov VI, Kochergin NA, Shilov AA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of surgical versus percutaneous versus hybrid multivessel coronary revascularization: 3 years’ follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14: 1163-5. 7.
Basman C, Hemli JM, Kim MC, et al. Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary revascularization methods. J Card Surg 2020; 35: 2710-8. 8.
Modrau IS, Nielsen PH, Nielsen DV, et al. Outcome of hybrid compared to conventional revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. Scand Cardiovasc J 2020; 54: 376-82. 9.
Qiu J, Zhu P, Liu Z, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of two-vessel coronary artery disease with proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11: 2402-9. 10.
Repossini A, Di Bacco L, Rosati F, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous strategies in left main stenosis: a propensity match study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2018; 19: 253-60. 11.
Ding T, Yuan X, Chen K, et al. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization vs conventional strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: a 10- year follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16: 50-60. 12.
Liu H, Huang D, Wang Z, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of a staged hybrid technique vs. coronary artery bypass surgery grafting in the treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Heart Surg Forum 2022; 25: E726-31. 13.
Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2024; 13: 55-161.
Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
|
