eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
2/2009
vol. 1
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:

Original article
Interstitial brachytherapy guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IBGIMRT) in cervical cancer: a dosimetric study

Daya Nand Sharma
,
V. Subramani
,
Goura Kisor Rath
,
K. S. Jothybasu
,
Amit Bahl
,
Parmod Kumar Julka
,
N. Gopishankar

J Contemp Brachyther 2009; 1, 2: 87-91
Online publish date: 2009/07/17
View full text Get citation
 
Purpose: Interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) is used as an alternative to intracavitary radiotherapy in the management of cervical carcinoma. We have devised a new technique called interstitial brachytherapy guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IBGIMRT) which can potentially reduce doses to organs at risk (OaRs). It utilizes IMRT planning on the target volume (TV) defined by implantation of IBT needles. This study compares the dosimetry of IBT and IBGIMRT.
Material and methods: CT scan images of 18 patients with cervical cancer, who have been already treated by HDR-BT, were used to generate two rival plans, IBT and IBGIMRT, for a prescription dose of 10 Gy. Following dosimetric factors were used for comparison: volume receiving 95% of prescription dose (V95), conformity index (COIN) and external volume index (EI) for target and for OaR, dose received by volume of 1 cm3 (D1cc), 2 cm3 (D2cc), 5 cm3 (D5cc) and also volume receiving 50% and 75% of prescription dose (V50 and V75).
Results: The two plans resulted in COIN difference of 49.8% (p < 0.0001) and EI difference of 36.4% (p < 0.0028) in favor of IBGIMRT. Mean D1cc, D2cc and D5cc values for bladder were 8.3 Gy, 7.6 Gy and 6.4 Gy; and 7.8 Gy, 7.3 Gy and 5.8 Gy with IBT and IBGIMRT, respectively (p > 0.05). Similar figures for rectum with IBT vs. IBGIMRT were 11.2 Gy vs. 7.02 Gy, 10.5 Gy vs. 6.4 Gy and 9.1 Gy vs. 4.8 Gy respectively (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Our novel technique, IBGIMRT, has shown its dosimetric superiority and therefore needs to be studied in clinical set up.
keywords:

cervical cancer, interstitial brachytherapy, HDR, dosimetry

  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.