3/2011
vol. 28
Original paper Distribution of Malassezia species in patients with atopic dermatitis – quality assessment
Post Dermatol Alergol 2011; XXVIII, 3: 187–190
Online publish date: 2011/07/01
Get citation
Introduction The fungi Malassezia are opportunists of significant clinical importance in humans and in animals. Malassezia spp. may be isolated from healthy human and animal skin. These fungi are involved in certain dermatological diseases and, in the case of considerable immunological insufficiency, they can cause systemic infections [1-6]. Currently, by techniques of molecular biology, 13 Malassezia species were identified, with 12 lipid-dependent species (M. furfur, M. globosa, M. obtusa, M. sympodialis, M. slooffiae, M. nana, M. dermatis, M. restricta, M. equina, M. japonica, M. yamatoensis and M. caprae) and one lipid-independent species (M. pachydermatis) among them [1, 6-9]. Frequency of the superficial fungal infections caused by species of the Malassezia genus depends on many different factors, such as socio-economic, climatic or geographical factors [10]. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic recurrent pruritic dermatosis, affecting mainly children. Atopic dermatitis may occur as an isolated disease or as a manifestation of a systemic allergic disorder, together with hay fever, bronchial asthma or food allergies. Atopic dermatitis is also observed in 1-3% of adults. The disease may occur for the first time in adulthood, persist from childhood or recur after a long period of remission [11-13]. Malassezia spp. seem to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of AD in adults, particularly when the skin lesions are localized to the head and neck. Since the 1980s it has been observed that the skin lesions in patients with AD disappear after the administration of local and systemic antifungal agents [14]. The prevalence of Malassezia spp. on the skin of adult patients with AD compared to the healthy population is similar and is between 50% and 80%, depending on the testing method. However, it was noticed that in patients with AD, positive results of skin tests with Malassezia spp. allergens and high plasma levels of specific IgE antibodies against Malassezia spp. are found significantly more often than in the control groups [15-17]. Therefore, currently, Malassezia spp. are considered to be an allergenic rather than an infectious agent, in the case of patients with AD. Exacerbation of the skin lesions in patients with AD may occur also as a result of activation of inflammatory reactions by the release of hydrolytic enzymes by Malassezia spp. [18, 19]. Aim The objective of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of Malassezia fungi on the skin in patients with psoriasis and search for a relationship between the occurrence of Malassezia and the severity of skin lesions, age and sex of the patients. Material and methods Experimental group The experimental group consisted of adult patients of both sexes, who were diagnosed with atopic dermatitis according to the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka. Clinical condition of the patients was assessed using SCORAD (Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis). Isolation and identification of Malassezia spp. Material for the mycological examination was obtained from each patient using sterile swabs moistened with saline. Smears were sampled from four sites of the body: 1) scalp, 2) face (nasolabial grooves and forehead), 3) chest (sternal region), 4) back (interscapular region). The material was inoculated on modified Dixon medium, which was composed of: malt extract 36 g, peptone 6 g, ox bile 20 g, Tween 40 10 ml, glycerol 2 ml, oleic acid 2 ml, chloramphenicol 250 mg, agar 12 g, distilled water 1000 ml. Cultures were incubated at 30°C for 10 days. Fungi were identified to the level of species on the basis of the colony morphology, microscopic appearance of the fungal cells obtained in the culture, by examining the ability of the fungi to grow without addition of lipids and by performing the urease test on Christensen’s solid medium (with Tween 40 and Tween 80). Results The obtained data were analysed using the programming language and software environment for statistical computing R (version 2.9.1, 2009). The study included 49 patients (29 women and 20 men) with atopic dermatitis, aged between 18 and 69. The results are presented in the Table 1 and in the Figure 1. Malassezia spp. were isolated from 27 patients (55.1%), including 16 women (55.2%) and 11 men (55%). In total, 63 isolates of Malassezia spp. were obtained from different body locations (37 from women and 26 from men). No statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of isolation of Malassezia spp. between women and men (2 test, p = 0.9905). Predominantly, Malassezia spp. were isolated from the interscapular region. Overall, 21 isolates were obtained from this site (33.3% of all isolates of Malassezia spp.): 11 isolates from women and 10 isolates from men. Least frequently, Malassezia spp. were isolated from the scalp (11 isolates – 17.5%) and only slightly more often from the seborrhoeic regions of the face (12 isolates – 19.0%). This tendency was seen in both women and men. However, in patients with particularly severe skin lesions on the skin of the head and neck, in the course of AD, Malassezia spp. were isolated from these sites in 71.4% of cases. From the skin of the chest, Malassezia spp. were isolated in 30.2% of the patients (11 isolates from women and 8 isolates from men). In 74.1% of the included patients in whom Malassezia spp. were found (68.7% women and 81.8% men), these fungi could be isolated from at least 2 different sites of the body. In 18.5% of the patients (25% women and 9% men), Malassezia spp. were found in all examined locations, at the same time. In the study, no difference in the frequency of occurrence of Malassezia spp. depending on the age of the patients could be seen (Student's t-test, p = 0.3656). Severity of skin lesions and subjective symptoms (pruritus, sleep disorder) in the course of AD expressed by the SCORAD index was between 10.2 and 80 (mean 40.8). Higher values of the SCORAD index were seen in the group in which Malassezia spp. could not be found (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.004347). In patients with severe AD (SCORAD index above 40) Malassezia spp. were isolated in 43.5% of the patients, whereas in the group with the SCORAD index below 40, the fungi were isolated from 65.4% of the patients. Discussion The role of Malassezia spp. in AD has been studied since the beginning of the 1980s, when it was observed that the skin lesions in this dermatosis disappear after the administration of antifungal agents [14]. It was found that fungi of the Malassezia genus, on the one hand, can be a component of the normal flora in healthy people, and on the other hand can act as an allergen and be a direct infectious factor causing superficial and systemic fungal infections [20, 21]. Clemmensen et al., examining patients with skin lesions on the face and neck and with concomitant pruritus, observed positive reactions in the skin prick tests with M. furfur antigen [14]. Many clinical trials confirm the presence of specific IgE antibodies against Malassezia spp. antigens in the plasma in patients with AD [15-17]. The frequency of occurrence of Malassezia spp. on the skin in patients with AD and in the healthy population is similar and varies between 50% and 80%. These differences are due to the testing method. In our study Malassezia spp. were isolated from 55.1% of the patients with atopic dermatitis, most frequently from the interscapular region (33.3%). Similar results were obtained by Nakabayashi et al. and Yim et al. [22, 23]. In the first of the cited studies, positive culture results were obtained in 54% of the samples from patients with AD and in 50% of the samples from healthy people [22]. In the latter one, Yim et al. obtained positive culture results in the case of 51.7% of the patients with AD (the 26S rDNA PCR-RFLP method was used) [23]. The species most frequently isolated was M. sympodialis (16.3%). There were significant differences in the occurrence of particular species, depending on the site of sampling. In samples obtained from the scalp and the face, M. restricta was isolated most often (30% and 16.7% respectively), whereas in samples from the skin of the chest, M. sympodialis was found most frequently (28.3%). In the study conducted by Nakabayashi, predominantly isolated species were M. globosa (22%) and M. furfur (17%). Malassezia furfur was isolated more often from the sites where skin lesions were observed (21%) than from the unchanged skin (11%) [22]. In our study, in the group with particularly severe skin lesions on the head and neck, positive culture results for Malassezia spp. were obtained in samples from the mentioned sites in the case of 71.4% of the patients. In the study, positive culture results for Malassezia spp. were more frequent in the case of patients with less severe AD (SCORAD index below 40) compared to the patients with severe AD. A possible reason for that could be a significantly decreased level of skin lipids in the latter group of patients. In the quantitative studies, it was found that in patients with severe AD, the number of colonies of Malassezia spp. was lower in the case of isolates from skin lesions compared to isolates from the unchanged skin [24]. Another explanation for this phenomenon could be intensified migration of the inflammatory cells to the skin and high concentrations of released mediators having antifungal properties in patients with severe AD [23]. The results of the study suggest that Malassezia is an allergenic rather than an infectious agent in patients with AD. It is worth stressing the role of particular species of the Malassezia genus in patients with skin lesions in different locations. Studies on the pathogenicity of Malassezia spp. have been conducted in the Department of Mycology since the 1980s [25-30]. In order to specify the exact role of Malassezia spp. in patients with AD, application of molecular biology methods is necessary. The characteristics of particular strains will be a subject of further studies in our department. The study was done at the Department of Mycology, Chair of Microbiology, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Krakow.
References 1. Dworecka-Kaszak B, Adamski Z. Zakażenia grzybami z rodzaju Malassezia. Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa 2005; 61-114. 2. Gupta AK, Batra R, Bluhm R, et al. Skin diseases associated with Malassezia species. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 785-98. 3. Diaz MR, Boekhout T, Theelen B, et al. Microcoding and flow cytometry as a high-throughput fungal identification system for Malassezia species. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55: 1197-209. 4. Batra R, Boekhout T, Guého E, et al. Malassezia Baillon, emerging clinical yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 2005; 5: 1101-13. 5. Ashbee HR. Recent developments in the immunology and biology of Malassezia species. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006; 47: 14-23. 6. Cabanes FJ, Theelen B, Castellá G, Boekhout T. Two new lipid-dependent Malassezia species from domestic animals. FEMS Yeast Res 2007; 7: 1064-76. 7. Hirai A, Kano R, Makimura K, et al. Malassezia nana sp., a novel lipid-dependent yeast species isolated from animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54: 623-7. 8. Sugita T, Takashima M, Kodama M, et al. Description of a new yeast species, Malassezia japonica, and its detection in patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 4695-9. 9. Sugita T, Tajima M, Takashima M, et al. A new yeast, Malassezia yamatoensis, isolated from a patient with seborrhoeic dermatitis, and its distribution in patients and healthy subjects. Microbiol Immunol 2004; 48: 579-83. 10. Gupta AK, Boekhout T, Theelen B, et al. Identification and typing of Malassezia species by amplified fragment length polymorphism and sequence analyses of the internal transcribed spacer and large-subunit regions of ribosomal DNA. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 4253-60. 11. Katsarou A, Armenaka MC. Atopic dermatitis in older patients: particular points. JEADV 2010. 12. Wanat-Krzak M, Kurzawa R. Atopowe zapalenie skóry – etiopatogeneza, diagnostyka i leczenie. Alergologia i pulmonologia wieku dziecięcego. Klin Pediatr 2002; 10: 237-44. 13. Silny W, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Gliński W, et al. Atopic dermatitis – contemporary view on pathomechanism and management. Position statement of the Polish Dermatological Society specialists. Post Dermatol Alergol 2010; 27: 365-83. 14. Clemmensen O, Hjorth N. Treatment of dermatitis of the head and neck with ketoconazole in patients with type I sensitivity to Pityrosporum orbiculare. Sem Dermatol 1983; 2: 26-9. 15. Back O, Scheynius A, Johansson SG. Ketoconazole in atopic dermatitis: therapeutic response is correlated with decrease in serum IgE. Arch Dermatol Res 1995; 287: 448-51. 16. Savolainen J, Lintu P, Kosonen J, et al. Pityrosporum and Candida specific and non-specific humoral, cellular and cytokine responses in atopic dermatitis patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2001; 31: 125-34. 17. Lindgren L, Wahlgren CF, Johansson SG, et al. Occurrence and clinical features of sensitization to Pityrosporum orbiculare and other allergens in children with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1995; 75: 300-4. 18. Silny W, Czarnecka-Operacz M. Atopowe zapalenie skóry – udział limfocytów T i komórek Langerhansa w rozwoju zmian skórnych. Alerg Astm Immunol 2000; 5: 15-20. 19. Adamski Z. Badania nad rolą drożdżaków lipofilnych Malassezia furfur (Pityrosporum ovale, Pityrosporum orbiculare) w różnych dermatozach. Rozprawa habilitacyjna, AM w Poznaniu 1995. 20. Borberg A, Faergemann J, Johansson SGO, et al. Pityrosporum ovale and atopic dermatitis in children and young adults. Acta Derm Venerol 1992; 72: 187-92. 21. Kieffer M, Bergbrant IM, Faergemann J. Immune reactions to Pityrosporum ovale in adult patients with atopic dermatitis and seborrhoeic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22: 739-42. 22. Nakabayashi A, Sel Y, Guillot J. Identification of Malassezia species isolated from patients with seborrhoeic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, pityriasis versicolor and normal subjects. Med Mycol 2000; 38: 337-41. 23. Yim SM, Kim JY, Ko JH, et al. Molecular analysis of Malassezia mikroflora on the skin of the patients with atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2010; 22: 41-7. 24. Schafer L, Kragballe K. Abnormalities in epidermal lipid metabolism in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 1991; 96: 10-5. 25. Budak A, Macura AB, Wnuk B, Laskownicka Z. Ocena wrażliwości grzybów lipoilnych z rodzaju Pityrosporum na leki przeciwgrzybicze. Med Dośw Mikrobiol 1985; 37: 51-5. 26. Macura AB, Budak A, Wnuk B, Laskownicka Z. Występowanie grzybów lipofilnych z rodzaju Pityrosporum u pacjentów z łupieżem pstrym i ich chorobotwórczość dla zwierząt doświadczalnych. Przeg Dermatol 1985; 72: 71-6. 27. Basta M, Macura AB, Heczko PB. Wpływ wyciągów z lipidów skóry i kwasów tłuszczowych na lipofilny Pityrosporum sp. in vitro. Med Dośw Mikrobiol 1985; 37: 215-8. 28. Macura AB, Budak A, Laskownicka Z. Recurrent Pityriasis versicolor. Ann Acad Med Lodz 1985; 27: 25-9. 29. Macura AB, Budak A, Wnuk B, Laskownicka Z. Występowanie grzybów lipofilnych z rodzaju Pityrosporumu pracowników Huty im. Lenina. Post Dermatol 1986; 3: 355-60. 30. Rup E, Skóra M, Krzyściak P, Macura AB. Ocena jakościowa występowania grzybów z rodzaju Malassezia na skórze u pacjentów z łuszczycą zwyczajną. Post Dermatol Alergol 2010; 4: 264-8.
Copyright: © 2011 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|
|