eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search

Open access

without publication fees

Journal integrated with

integrated with publons
Share:
Send email
Share:
Special paper

Remote, automatic, digital preanesthetic evaluation – are we there yet?

Michał Pasternak
1
,
Wojciech Szczeklik
2, 3
,
Szymon Białka
4
,
Paweł Andruszkiewicz
5
,
Marta Szczukocka
1
,
Aleksandra Pawlak
6
,
Elżbieta Rypulak
1
,
Dawid Pytliński
7
,
Michał Borys
1
,
Mirosław Czuczwar
1

  1. 2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
  2. Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic, Krakow, Poland
  3. Centre for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine with Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
  5. 2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  6. Department of Anaesthesiological Nursing and Intensive Medical Care, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
  7. Wroclaw School of Information Technology “Horyzont,” The Faculty of Informatics, Wroclaw, Poland
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2024; 56, 2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.138959
Online publish date: 2024/05/09
Article file
- Remote automatic.pdf  [0.13 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Zhang K, Rashid-Kolvear M, Waseem R, Englesakis M, Chung F. Virtual preoperative assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2021; 75: 110540. doi: 10.1016/ j.jclinane.2021.110540.
2. Aldawoodi NN, Muncey AR, Serdiuk AA, et al. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing telemedicine evaluation in the preanesthesia testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center. Cancer Control 2021; 28: 107327482110443. doi: 10.1177/10732748211044347.
3. Morau E, Blanc A, Boisson C, Sawyers T, Lefrant J, Cuvillon P. Telemedicine for preanesthesia consultations during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29: 621-624. doi: 10.1089/tmj. 2022.0143.
4. Gordon D. Sustainability in the operating room. Anesthesiol Clin 2020; 38: 679-692. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2020.06.006.
5. Kamdar NV, Huverserian A, Jalilian L, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a telemedicine preoperative evaluation initiative at a Major Academic Medical Center. Anesth Analg 2020; 131: 1647-1656. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005208.
6. Lozada MJ, Nguyen JTC, Abouleish A, Prough D, Przkora R. Patient preference for the pre-anesthesia evaluation: telephone versus in-office assessment. J Clin Anesth 2016; 31: 145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane. 2015.12.040.
7. Fishman M, Mirante B, Dai F, Kurup V. Patient preferences on telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation. Can J Anesth Can Anesth 2015; 62: 433-434. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0280-0.
8. Gibas G, Liebisch M, Eichenberg C, et al. Preoperative anxiety after face-to-face patient assessment versus preanaesthesia telemedicine (PANTEM) in adults: a randomised clinical trial. Wien Med Wochenschr 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10354-022-00937-y [Online ahead of print].
9. Shi Y, Yan J, Wang S, Li Y, Deng X. Efficacy of a new day surgery management mode based on WeChat: a study protocol for randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e058204. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen- 2021-058204.
10. Rumer KK, Saraswathula A, Melcher ML. Prehabilitation in our most frail surgical patients: are wearable fitness devices the next frontier? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21: 188-193. doi: 10.1097/MOT. 0000000000000295.
11. Finley DJ, Stevens CJ, Emond JA, et al. Potential effectiveness of a surgeon-delivered exercise prescription and an activity tracker on pre-operative exercise adherence and aerobic capacity of lung cancer patients. Surg Oncol 2021; 37: 101525. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021. 101525.
12. De Hert S, Imberger G, Carlisle J, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 684-722. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283499e3b.
13. Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 522-538. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1067.
14. Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2022; 43: 3826-3924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
15. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Perioperative care in adults. NICE guideline [NG180]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg180/
16. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services. Clinical guideline [CG138]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg138/
17. Ministry of Health, Poland. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 16 grudnia 2016 r. Poz. 392 Załącznik do obwieszczenia Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 18 stycznia 2022 r. (poz. 392) w sprawie standardu organizacyjnego opieki zdrowotnej w dziedzinie anestezjologii i intensywnej terapii. 2022. Available from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20220000392/O/D20220392.pdf (Accessed: 13.06.2023).
18. Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, Go K, Kohm C, Chung F. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1605-1607. doi: 10.1097/ 00000542-200406000-00038.
19. Khera KD, Blessman JD, Deyo-Svendsen ME, Miller NE, Angstman KB. Pre-anesthetic medical evaluations: criteria considerations for telemedicine alternatives to face to face visits. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2022; 9: 233339282210748. doi: 10.1177/23333928221074895.
20. Suh HS, Tully JL, Meineke MN, Waterman RS, Gabriel RA. Identification of preanesthetic history elements by a natural language processing engine. Anesth Analg 2022; 135: 1162-1171. doi: 10.1213/ANE. 0000000000006152.
21. Azizad O, Joshi GP. Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation: review of current literature and recommendations for future implementation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34: 672-677. doi: 10.1097/ACO. 0000000000001064.
22. Shay D, Kumar B, Bellamy D, et al. Assessment of ChatGPT success with specialty medical knowledge using anaesthesiology board examination practice questions. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: e31-e34. doi: 10.1016/ j.bja.2023.04.017.
23. O’Shea J, Coleman M, Mahdy S, Corbett M, Curley G. Evaluation of an online preoperative assessment tool. BMJ Innov 2020; 6: 127-131. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000344.
24. Goodhart IM, Andrzejowski JC, Jones GL, et al. Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative): development and validation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34: 221-228. doi: 10.1097/ EJA.0000000000000545.
25. Almeshari M, Khalifa M, El-Metwally A, Househ M, Alanazi A. Quality and accuracy of electronic pre-anesthesia evaluation forms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2018; 160: 51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb. 2018.03.006.
26. Applegate RL, Gildea B, Patchin R, et al. Telemedicine Pre-anesthesia Evaluation: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Telemed E-Health 2013; 19: 211-216. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0132.
27. Hrishi AP, Prathapadas U, Praveen R, Vimala S, Sethuraman M. A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of virtual versus direct airway assessment in the preoperative period in patients presenting for neurosurgery: a quest for safer preoperative practice in neuroanesthesia in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic! J Neurosci Rural Pract 2021; 12: 718-725. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735824.
28. Jeon KJ, Kim YH, Ha EG, et al. Quantitative analysis of the mouth opening movement of temporomandibular joint disorder patients according to disc position using computer vision: a pilot study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12: 1909-1918. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-629.
29. Zhang F, Xu Y, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Yang K. Critical element prediction of tracheal intubation difficulty: Automatic Mallampati classification by jointly using handcrafted and attention-based deep features. Comput Biol Med 2022; 150: 106182. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed. 2022.106182.
30. Hayasaka T, Kawano K, Kurihara K, Suzuki H, Nakane M, Kawamae K. Creation of an artificial intelligence model for intubation difficulty classification by deep learning (convolutional neural network) using face images: an observational study. J Intensive Care 2021; 9: 38. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00551-x.
31. Leng S, Tan RS, Chai KTC, Wang C, Ghista D, Zhong L. The electronic stethoscope. Biomed Eng OnLine 2015; 14: 66. doi: 10.1186/s12938- 015-0056-y.
32. Fan M, Wang Q, Liu J, et al. Real-world evaluation of the Stemoscope electronic tele-auscultation system. Biomed Eng OnLine 2022; 21: 63. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-01032-4.
33. Grzywalski T, Piecuch M, Szajek M, et al. Practical implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms in pulmonary auscultation examination. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178: 883-890. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03363-2.
34. Ghanayim T, Lupu L, Naveh S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based stethoscope for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Am J Med 2022; 135: 1124-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.032.
35. Padilla-Ortiz AL, Ibarra D. Lung and heart sounds analysis: state-of-the-art and future trends. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2018; 46: 33-52. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2018025112.
36. Kevat A, Kalirajah A, Roseby R. Artificial intelligence accuracy in detecting pathological breath sounds in children using digital stethoscopes. Respir Res 2020; 21: 253. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01523-9.
37. Facile R, Muhlbradt EE, Gong M, et al. Use of Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) standards for real-world data: expert perspectives from a qualitative Delphi Survey. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10: e30363. doi: 10.2196/30363.
38. Isakadze N, Martin SS. How useful is the smartwatch ECG? Trends Cardiovasc Med 2020; 30: 442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.10.010.
39. Kennedy A, Doggart P, Smith SW, et al. Device agnostic AI-based analysis of ambulatory ECG recordings. J Electrocardiol 2022; 74: 154-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.09.002.
40. Hsieh J chien, Hsu MW. A cloud computing based 12-lead ECG telemedicine service. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12: 77. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-77.
41. Li K, Elgalad A, Cardoso C, Perin EC. Using the Apple watch to record multiple-lead electrocardiograms in detecting myocardial infarction: where are we now? Tex Heart Inst J 2022; 49: e227845. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-22-7845.
42. Albahli S, Ahmad Hassan Yar GN. AI-driven deep convolutional neural networks for chest X-ray pathology identification. J X-Ray Sci Technol 2022; 30: 365-376. doi: 10.3233/XST-211082.
43. López-Úbeda P, Martín-Noguerol T, Juluru K, Luna A. Natural language processing in radiology: update on clinical applications. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19: 1271-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.06.016.
44. Gentry C. A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. 2009. Available from: https://crypto.stanford.edu/craig/craig-thesis.pdf (Accessed: 13.03.2024).
45. Tu T, Palepu A, Schaekermann M, et al. Towards conversational dia­gnostic AI. arXiv:2401.05654; 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.05654.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.