The role of prophylactic mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia in laparotomy. Is it time to change practice?

Michael Sugrue; Alison Johnston; Saqib Zeeshan; Paula Loughlin; Magda Bucholc; Angus Watson

doi:10.5114/ait.2019.87475

eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Open access

Journal integrated with

4/2019
vol. 51

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Review article

The role of prophylactic mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia in laparotomy. Is it time to change practice?

Michael Sugrue

^{1, 2}

,

Alison Johnston

¹

,

Saqib Zeeshan

¹

,

Paula Loughlin

^{2, 3}

,

Magda Bucholc

²

,

Angus Watson

^{2, 4}

Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Ireland
EU INTERREG Centre for Personalised Medicine, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering, and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus, Derry-Londonderry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Department of Surgery, Altnagelvin Hospital, Derry-Londonderry, Northern Ireland , United Kingdom
Raighmore Hospital, Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2019; 51, 4: 323–329

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2019.87475

Online publish date: 2019/08/23

View full text Get citation

PlumX metrics:

Background
Incisional hernia (IH) occurs in approximately 25% of laparotomies. Prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) may significantly reduce IH but is not widely used. This paper will review the evidence relating to the role of PMP in laparotomy and its ability to effectively and safely have an impact on hernia reduction.

Methods
An ethically approved review of all published English articles relating to IH prevention following laparotomy was undertaken at Letterkenny University Hospital by searching PubMed, Scopus, and electronic databases over a 20-year period from January 1999 to March 2019. The search terms “incisional hernia”, “laparotomy”, “mesh placement”, “reoperation”, “readmitted”, and “rates” were used in combination.

Results
The literature identified 17 publications, of which 14 were randomised, controlled trials and three were prospective cohort studies from 22 countries. Bariatric surgery accounted for eight of the 17 studies. Onlay mesh placement was used in five studies. Preperitoneal, retrorectus, intra-peritoneal, combinations of and sublay were used in 4, 3, 2, 2, and 1 studies, respectively. In two studies both sublay and onlay were performed. A total of 2777 patients were reported. One study had two publications with different lengths of follow-up.

Conclusions
Currently surgeons need to consider changing practice to firstly ensure they practice optimum laparotomy closure technique and potentially use PMP. If not using PMP they need to question why, because PMP will more than halve the IH rate, especially in higher risk patients undergoing laparotomy.

keywords:

The role of prophylactic mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia in laparotomy. Is it time to change practice?

Michael Sugrue 1, 2 , Alison Johnston 1 , Saqib Zeeshan 1 , Paula Loughlin 2, 3 , Magda Bucholc 2 , Angus Watson 2, 4

incisional hernia, laparotomy, emergency surgery, prophylactic mesh placement, mesh

Michael Sugrue

^{1, 2}

,

Alison Johnston

¹

,

Saqib Zeeshan

¹

,

Paula Loughlin

^{2, 3}

,

Magda Bucholc

²

,

Angus Watson

^{2, 4}