en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Zeszyty specjalne Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
Wyszukiwanie
Zasady redakcyjne
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
4/2021
vol. 17
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Wyślij znajomemu
Udostępnij:
Badania kliniczne

Wiarygodność dwuwymiarowej metody prognozowania wymiarów dróg oddechowych u pacjentów po operacjach ortognatycznych

Kevser Kurt Demirsoy
1
,
Gokhan Coban
2
,
Gokmen Kurt
3

  1. Orthodontics, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Faculty of Dentistry, Turkey
  2. Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Turkey Orthodontics
  3. Bezmialem Foundation University, Faculty of Dentistry, Turkey
Forum Ortod 2021; 17 (4): 263-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2021.112338
Data publikacji online: 2022/01/15
Plik artykułu:
- FO_T17(4)_2021_Demirsoy.pdf  [2.46 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Wenzel A, Williams S, Ritzau M. Relationships of changes in craniofacial morphology, head posture and nasopharyngeal airway size following mandibular osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 138-43.
2. Enacar A, Aksoy AÜ, Şençift Y, Haydar B, Aras K. Changes inhypopharyngeal airway space and in tongue and hyoid bone positions following the surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1994; 9: 285-90.
3. Athanasiou AE, Toutoutzakis N, Mavreas D, Ritzaus M, Wenzel A. Alterations of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal depth and their relationship after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 259-65.
4. Wickwire NA, White RP, Proffit WR. The effect of mandibular osteotomy on tongue position. J Oral Surg 1972; 30: 184-90.
5. Faur CI, Roman RA, Bran S, Dinu C, Coclici A, Rotaru H, Hedesiu M. The Changes in Upper Airway Volume after Orthognathic Surgery Evaluated by Individual Segmentation on CBCT Images. Maedica 2019; 14: 213-9.
6. Yamashita AL, Iwaki LCV, Pinto GNS, Gerke BA, Chicarelli M, Iwaki Filho L. Accuracy of two-dimensional pharyngeal airway space prediction for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 22: 197-202.
7. Kolokitha OE, Topouzelis N. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011; 10: 236-45.
8. Kanavakis G, Häner ST, Matthey F, Gkantidis N. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial cone-beam computed tomographies for facial soft tissue assessment: Reproducibility and segmentation effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021; 159: 343-51.
9. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 957-65.
10. Alves M Jr, Baratieri C, Mattos CT, Brunetto D, Fontes Rda C, Santos JR, Ruellas AC. Is the airway volume being correctly analyzed? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 657-61.
11. De Souza Carvalho ACG, Magro Filho O, Garcia Jr IR, Araujo PM, Nogueira RLM. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of superior posterior airway space after maxillomandibular advancement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1102-11.
12. Lopatienė K, Dabkutė A, Juškevičiūtė V. Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway. Stomatol 2016; 18: 21-5.
13. Guimarães TM, Bariani RC, Iafigliola SG, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in assessment on pharynx effects of orthopedic-surgical treatment - a review of the literature. Sleep Sci 2019; 12: 106-9.
14. Cabral M, de Queiroz Ribeiro LR, Cardeal CM, Bittencourt MA, Crusoé-Rebello IM, Souza-Machado A. Evaluation of the oropharynx in Class I and II skeletal patterns by CBCT. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 21: 27-31.
15. Aoki J, Shinozuka K, Yamagata K, Nakamura R, Sato T, Ohtani S, Ogisawa S, Yanagawa K, Tonogi M. Cephalometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway space after maxillary advancement surgery. J Oral Sci 2019; 27; 61: 529-33.
16. Lowe AA, Santamaria JD, Fleetham JA, Price C. Facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 484-91.
17. Feng X, Li G, Qu Z, Liu L, Näsström K, Shi XQ. Comparative analysis of upper airway volume with lateral cephalograms and conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147: 197-204.
18. Resnick CM, Inverso G, Wrzosek M, Padwa BL, Kaban LB, Peacock ZS. Is there a difference in cost between standard and virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 1827-33.
19. Lu M, Wang Z, Zhan X, Wei Y. Obstructive sleep apnea increases the risk of cardiovascular damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging studies. Syst Rev 2021; 30: 212.
20. Tseng YC, Hsiao SY, Cheng JH, Hsu KJ, Chen CM. Postoperative Skeletal Stability and Pharyngeal Airway: Counterclockwise versus Clockwise Rotation during Mandibular Setback Surgery. Biomed Res Int 2020; 30: 3283080.
21. Rodrigues E, Dhupar V, Akkara F. Understanding Predictability Error in Orthognathic Surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2019; 18: 474-8.
22. Kim D, Ho DC, Mai H, Zhang X, Shen SGF, Shen S, Yuan P, Liu S, Zhang G, Zhou X, Gateno J, Liebschner MAK, Xia JJ. A clinically validated prediction method for facial soft-tissue changes following double-jaw surgery. Med Phys 2017; 44: 4252-61.
23. Kusnoto B. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34: 417-26.
24. El H, Palomo JM. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 50e1-9.
25. Bin LR, Filho LI, Yamashita AL, de Souza Pinto GN, Mendes RA, Ramos AL, Dos Santos Previdelli IT, Iwaki LCV. How does bimaxillary orthognathic surgery change dimensions of maxillary sinuses and pharyngeal airway space? Angle Orthod 2020; 1: 715-22
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.