Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Dose-response and time-lagged effect of daily training load on athlete well-being during an international rugby series

Blair T. Crewther
1, 2, 3, 4
,
Benjamin Serpell
1, 5
,
Neill Potts
6
,
Liam P. Kilduff
7, 8
,
Christian J. Cook
1, 4

  1. School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
  2. Institute of Sport – National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
  3. School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  4. Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College, London, UK
  5. Geelong Cats Football Club, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  6. Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, Australia
  7. A-STEM, School of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  8. Welsh Institute of Performance Science (WIPS), Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Biol Sport. 2025;42(1):39–45
Online publish date: 2024/05/07
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Rugby training and competition both impose a stress or training load (TL) affecting athlete wellbeing. Current understanding of the TL dose-response and time-lagged changes (i.e., delayed effects) in wellbeing is limited. We addressed these gaps using data from a 3-week international series. Twenty-two elite male rugby players were assessed 4–5 days a week for daily TL and well-being (i.e., mood, stress, soreness, fatigue, sleep quality). A distributed lag non-linear model was used to estimate the TL effect, at the within-person mean (358 A.U), +1SD (576 A.U) and +2SD (794 A.U), on well-being at 0–5 lag days. Average daily TL declined by -38% and -45% in weeks two and three (vs. week 1), respectively, with weekly fluctuations of +27% to -58% (vs. Monday training). The well-being subscales oscillated around a stable baseline. Compared to mean-centered scores, a significant decline in mood and sleep quality (-0.6 to -2.0 units; -9 to -30%) emerged at all TLs, with a delayed shift at higher loads. Elevated stress, soreness, and fatigue responses (up to 3.7 units; 76%) emerged with increasing daily TLs, including a biphasic rise in stress and fatigue at higher loads. In conclusion, we gained detailed insight into physical stress and the temporal sequence of well-being during an international rugby series. Different daily TLs predicted adverse well-being responses (i.e., declining mood and sleep quality, rise in stress, soreness, fatigue) that varied in lag timing, duration, and magnitude. Explicating these associations can assist weekly planning and strategies to optimize recovery, performance, and team success.
keywords:

Contact Sport, Trainability, Recovery, Adaptation, Stress

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.