en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2544-2538
ISSN: 2450-8624
Pielęgniarstwo w Opiece Długoterminowej / Long-Term Care Nursing
Bieżący numer Archiwum O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
2/2024
vol. 9
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

Analiza aktywności fizycznej mieszkańców terenów wiejskich w perspektywie chorób przewlekłych na przykładzie pacjentów Centrum Rehabilitacji Rolników KRUS w Jedlcu.

Marek Przybył
,
Jędrzej J. Ksepka
,
Jaśmina M. Hendrysiak
,
Wiktor Karasiewicz

Long-Term Care Nursing 2024; 9 (2): 71-90
Data publikacji online: 2024/07/12
Plik artykułu:
- 6.pdf  [1.25 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

Regular physical activity has a positive impact on physical and mental well-being. According to the 2020 WHO guidelines, it is a factor in reducing the risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers, further supporting treatment against them [1]. Performing sports activities prevents cognitive decline, symptoms associated with depression, and lowers anxiety levels [2,3]. In addition, during high-intensity activities like running, endocannabinoids responsible for friendly sensations, known as “runners high”, are produced by the body [4].

According to the new recommendations, it is recommended that people aged 18-64 perform moderate-intensity physical activity for 150-300 minutes per week or high-intensity physical activity for 75-150 minutes. After age 65, assuming the presence of chronic diseases and disabilities, exercise is also advisable to slow down bone degenerative processes and prevent falls. However, they should be performed with greater caution, after consultation with the patient’s treating physician. In contrast, the school-age population requires an average of 60 minutes a day for exercise of moderate to high aerobic intensity [1].

Despite the many proven benefits that sports provide for general well-being, there are reasons in society for giving up physical activities. These include lack of time caused by an overload of work duties, lack of money, a deficit in the infrastructure of the location where one lives, or bad weather conditions, among others [5]. Insufficient awareness of the importance of regular physical activity is also noted among the elderly and rural communities. In rural areas, the problem is compounded by poor infrastructure that makes it difficult to make medical appointments and patient education [6]. According to WHO reports, globally, 1/3 of women and 1/4 of men do not engage in sufficient physical activity for health outcomes. In addition, in countries with higher economic status, this problem is revealed twice as often as in countries with lower status [7].

Lack of exercise becomes a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, osteoporosis, or cognitive dysfunction. It also correlates with predisposition to malignancies, particularly breast cancer [8,9,10,11]. In addition, diseases that could have been prevented by regular physical activity are the reason for the high cost of treatment, which is also related to the lower accessibility of doctors to patients with diseases independent of their daily habits [12].

Education on the importance and impact of physical activity on human health is recommended from an early age, as its positive effects on concentration, memory and emotions can be seen in childhood. Therefore, the values represented by the home environment as well as the school environment in this aspect are very important [13]. Thanks to organizations supported by the European Commission and lower authorities, a healthy lifestyle is promoted while taking into account the socioeconomic, or demographic, problem of the population. This occurs by raising awareness in all age groups and increasing accessibility to various sports activities [14]. Despite the many positive movements in society and the culture of body care, it is necessary to constantly monitor the state of patients’ knowledge of modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases in order to prevent premature pathologies.

The purpose of this study was to assess the type of physical activity by intensity, type and duration characterizing the patients of the Rehabilitation Center in Jedlec. The results of this work will help determine the health habits pertaining to the rural population and revise the need to implement new methods of health promotion.

Material and methods

The study was based on 612 patients located at a rehabilitation center for farmers in Jedlec. The division of respondents by age and gender is shown in Table 1. The study was conducted between August 2021 and September 2022. Respondents were asked to complete a proprietary questionnaire containing questions about the presence of hypertension, history of cancer, presence of musculoskeletal pain and their level of physical activity in the last 7 days before arriving at the center. The level of activity performed was assessed in terms of its intensity, type and duration. The survey questions selected for this paper are part of a more extensive study. The questionnaire consisted of single-choice and multiple-choice questions. The obtained answers were interpreted and differentiated according to sex, age and education. Calculations were performed using IBM SPSS version 29.0. α=0.05 was used as the level of significance. A result was considered statistically significant when p<α.

Table 1

Division of respondents by age and gender.

Parameter analyzed
GenderAge groupNumberPercentage
Women< 49 years7823.6%
50-59 years23270.3%
60+ years206.1%
Overall330100%
Men< 49 years5017.7%
50-59 years15053.2%
60+ years8229.1%
Overall282100%

Results

Performing intense activities in the last 7 days before arriving at the center (e.g., lifting heavy weights, heavy physical labor, digging, aerobics, fast cycling, running) was declared by 34.6% (N=212) of the surveyed individuals, while more than half of them (N=400; 65.4%) denied doing so. The percentage of women (N=126; 38.2%) who indicated that they performed intensive exercise during this period was slightly higher than that of male respondents (N=86; 30.5%) (Chart 1). A significant relationship was shown between the variables - women were more likely than men to have performed intensive physical activities in the last 7 days preceding arrival at the rehabilitation center in Jedlec (χ2=3.967, df=1, p=0.046). Cramer’s V coefficient is positive with weak strength (r=0.081). Intensive physical activity was performed by 41.4% of those under 49 years old, 32.7% of those between 50-59 years old and 28.4% of those over 60 years old. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between age and the variable under study (p=0.106). In addition, a significantly statistical relationship between education and the performance of intensive physical activities was also shown - as education increases, the frequency of intensive physical activities increases (χ2=10.692, df=4, p=0.030). Cramer’s V coefficient is an additive with weak strength (r=0.132). For BMI, there was no statistically significant relationship between this variable and intensive physical activities (χ2=0.729, df=2, p=0.695). For the prevalence of hypertension, musculoskeletal pain and history of cancer there were no statistically significant association between these variables and intense physical activity (p=0.276), (p=0.111), (p=0.972) respectively.

Chart 1

Performing intensive physical activities in the last 7 days prior to arrival at the center, by sex (n=612).

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g001_min.jpg

On average, women (5.51±3.42) spent fewer hours per day on intensive activities compared to men (6.46 ± 3.36). The time span measured in hours in both groups ranged from 1 hour to 15 hours. The median in women was 5 hours, meaning that 50% of women spent 5 hours or more, and 50% spent 5 hours or less. In contrast, the median in men was 6 hours, meaning that 50% of men spent 6 hours or more on intensive activities during the day, and 50% spent 6 hours or less (Table 5). Women with no response who could not indicate the time they spent on these activities - 39 people, men - 25 people.

Table 2

Prevalence of hypertension among respondents.

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Hypertension+24039.2%
-37260.8%
Table 3

Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among respondents.

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Musculoskeletal pain+56692.5%
-467.5%
Table 4

History of cancer in respondents.

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Cancer+264.3%
-58695.7%
Table 5

Performing intense physical activities in the last 7 days prior to arrival at the center (n=612).

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Women+12638.2
-20461.8
Men+8630.5
-19669.5

Performing moderate activities in the last 7 days before arriving at the center (e.g., lifting lighter weights, cycling at a normal pace, housework, light household chores) was declared by 52.3% (N=320) of those surveyed, while 47.7% (N=292) did not indicate performing the mentioned activities. The percentage of women (N=191; 57.9%) indicating that they performed these activities was higher than the percentage of men (N=129; 46.5%). A significant relationship was shown between the variables - women were more likely than men to have performed moderate physical activities in the last 7 days preceding arrival at the rehabilitation center in Jedlec (χ2=8.974, df=1, p=0.003). Cramer’s V coefficient is positive with weak strength (r=0.121) (Chart 4). Moderate physical activity was performed by 57% of those under 49 years old, 51% of those between 50-59 years old and 44.1% of those over 60 years old. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between age and the variable under study (p=0.198). In addition, a significantly statistical relationship between education and the performance of moderate physical activities was also shown - as education increases, the frequency of moderate physical activities increases (χ2=17.002, df=4, p=0.002). Cramer’s V coefficient is additive with weak strength (r=0.167). For BMI, there was no statistically significant association between this variable and moderate physical activities (χ2=1.647, df=2, p=0.439). For the prevalence of hypertension, musculoskeletal pain and history of cancer there were no statistically significant association between these variables and moderate physical activity (p=0.384), (p=0.499), (p=0.366) respectively.

Chart 2

Number of days per week spent doing intense physical activities by women.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g002_min.jpg
Chart 3

Number of days per week spent doing intense physical activities by men.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g003_min.jpg
Chart 4

Performing moderate physical activities by sex (n=612).

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g004_min.jpg
Chart 5

Number of days per week spent on moderate physical activities by women.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g005_min.jpg
Chart 6

Number of days per week spent on moderate physical activities by men.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g006_min.jpg

On average, women (4.87±3.29) spent more hours per day on moderate activities compared to men (4.55± 3.06). The time span measured in hours in women ranged from 1 hour to 14 hours, while in men it ranged from 1 hour to 12 hours. The median in both men and women was 4 hours, meaning that 50% of women and men spent 4 hours or more on moderate activities during the day, and 50% spent 4 hours or less (Table 6). For the number of hours and minutes, 64 women and 48 men were unable to provide these data.

Table 6

Performing moderate physical activities in the last 7 days prior to arrival at the center (n=612).

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Women+19157.9
-13942.1
Men+13146.5
-15153.5

In the case of walking for at least 60 minutes a day at a time, this is where 54.6% (N=334) declared themselves, while 45.4% (N=278) of people indicated that they had not walked that much time in the last 7 days before coming to the center. The percentage of women indicating this type of activity was 56.1% (N=185), while men were 52.8% (N=149) (Chart 7). There was no statistically significant association between men and women for the activity of walking for 60 minutes at a time during the day (χ2=0.505, df=1, p=0.477). No such relationship also occurred between BMI and the variable in question (χ2=1.330, df=2, p=0.514). Walking for at least 60 minutes a day at a time was performed by 61.7% of those under 49 years old, 52.4% of those between 50-59 years old and 55.9% of those over 60 years old. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between age and the variable under study (p=0.094). On the other hand, there was a significantly statistical relationship between education and the described variable - as the level of education increased, the frequency of performing a single activity for at least 60 minutes increased (χ2=19.387, df=4, p=0.001). Cramer’s V coefficient is additive with weak strength (r=0.178). For the prevalence of hypertension and history of cancer there were no statistically significant association between these variables and walking for 60 minutes at a time during the day (p=0.761), (p=0.92) respectively. However, there was a significantly statistical relationship between the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and walking for 60 minutes at a time (p=0.028).

Chart 7

Walking for 60 minutes a day at a time, by sex (n=612).

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g007_min.jpg

On average, women (5.31±3.65) spent more hours per day walking more than 60 minutes at least once compared to men (4.71±1.95). In women, the minimum time spent on this activity was 1 hour, while the maximum was 17 hours. In contrast, in men, the minimum time was 1 hour, while the maximum time was 16 hours. The median in both men and women was 4 hours, meaning that 50% of women and men performed these activities for 4 hours or less, and 50% for 4 hours or more (Table 7). 109 people could not indicate the number of hours and minutes per day - 67 women and 42 men.

Table 7

Walking once for 60 minutes a day of physical activities in the last 7 days prior to arrival at the center (n=612).

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Women+18556.1
-14543.9
Men+14952.8
-13347.2

Those who declared how much time they spent in the last week before coming to the rehabilitation center doing leisure time sedentary behavior such as sitting at a desk, visiting friends, reading or watching TV accounted for 41.8% (N=256) of respondents. More than half of them (N=356; 58.2%) could not indicate how long these activities took them. The percentage of women (N=150; 45.5%) able to specify this time was higher than the percentage of men (N=106; 37.6%) who also did (Chart 8). No statistically significant relationship was shown between BMI level (χ2=0.251, df=2, p=0.882), age (χ2=0.265, df=2, p=0.876) and leisure time sedentary behavior. A statistically significant association was shown between gender and leisure time sedentary behavior (χ2=0.386, df=1, p=0.049). Women (58.6%) were more likely to have performed leisure time sedentary behavior in the last 7 days before coming to the center than male respondents (41.4%). In addition, a statistically significant relationship was also shown between the education of the subjects and this type of activity (χ2=31.481, df=4, p=0.001). Those with vocational education (43.0%) were more likely to spend time on leisure time sedentary behavior than those with primary (7.0%), secondary (37.9%), postsecondary (5.9%) and higher education (6.3%).

Chart 8

Number of days per week spent by respondents walking for at least 60 minutes per day at a time, by women.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g008_min.jpg
Chart 9

Number of days per week spent by respondents walking for at least 60 minutes per day at a time, by men.

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g009_min.jpg
Chart 10

Leisure time sedentary behavior of respondents by sex (n=612).

Source: author's own study.

/f/fulltexts/PWOD/54518/POD-9-54518-g010_min.jpg

On average, women (2.81±2.09) spent fewer hours per day on leisure time sedentary behavior compared to men (3.05± 2.12) in the last 7 days before coming to the center. The minimum time reported by women and men was 1 hour, the maximum was 12 hours. The median in women and men was 2 hours, meaning that 50% of women spent 2 hours or more on leisure time sedentary behavior during the day, and 50% spent 2 hours or less. In contrast, the median value in men was 3 hours (Table 8).

Table 8

Leisure time sedentary behavior in the last 7 days prior to arrival at the center (n=612).

Parameter analyzedNumber
N%
Women+15045.5
-18054.5
Men+10637.6
-17662.4
Table 9

Amount of time (days per week, hours and minutes per day) spent on intensive physical activities by sex (n=212).

VariableNMSDMeMinMax
Number of days per weekWomen1261,620,48517
Men861,700,46517
Number of hours per dayWomen785,513,425115
Men566,463,366115
Number of minutes per dayWomen931,118,2030,015,045,0
Men528,04,4730,020,030,0

[i] N - number of observations, M - arithmetic mean, SD - standard deviation, Me - median, Min - minimum value, Max - maximum value.

[ii] Source: author’s own study.

Table 10

Amount of time (days per week, hours and minutes per day) spent on moderate physical activities by sex (n=320).

VariableNMSDMeMinMax
Number of days per weekWomen1915,141,986,017
Men1294,401,994,517
Number of hours per dayWomen1144,873,294,0114
Men734,553,064,0112
Number of minutes per dayWomen1327,3116,0230,010,075,0
Men826,8810,3230,05,040,0

[i] N - number of observations, M - arithmetic mean, SD - standard deviation, Me - median, Min - minimum value, Max - maximum value.

[ii] Source: author’s own study.

Table 11

Number of days per week spent by respondents walking for at least 60 minutes per day at a time, by sex (n=334).

VariableNMSDMeMinMax
Number of days per weekWomen1856,051,557,01,07,0
Men1495,321,956,01,07,0
Number of hours per dayWomen1145,313,654,01,017,0
Men1034,713,484,01,016,0
Number of minutes per dayWomen558,032,7130,020,090,0
Men333,335,7730,030,040,0

[i] N - number of observations, M - arithmetic mean, SD - standard deviation, Me - median, Min - minimum value, Max - maximum value.

[ii] Source: author’s own study.

Table 12

Time spent on leisure time sedentary behavior by sex (n=256).

VariableNMSDMeMinMax
Number of hours per dayWomen1452,812,092,0112
Men1053,052,123,0112
Number of minutes per dayWomen526,08,9430,010,030,0
Men130,00,030,030,030,0

[i] N - number of observations, M - arithmetic mean, SD - standard deviation, Me - median, Min – minimum value, Max - maximum value.

[ii] Source: author’s own study

Discussion

Only 34.6% of the respondents had engaged in intense physical activity (e.g. lifting heavy objects) in the seven days prior to arrival at the centre. For moderate activity such as cycling at normal pace, the percentage was higher at 52.3%. The work of Rowiński R i wsp. [15] describes that a form of moderate activity such as gardening was carried out by 53.4% of men and 34.7% of women, however, the age range of the respondents was 65-85+. Walking for a minimum of 60 minutes at a time was performed by 54.6% of patients. In addition, leisure time sedentary behavior was performed by 41.8% of the subjects. This is particularly significant as some sources report that the percentage of physically inactive people living in rural areas is 31.7% [16]. Nowadays, people are increasingly leading sedentary lifestyles. This is due, among other things, to office work and excessive use of cell phones [17]. According to the studies, about 27.5% of the global adult population does not meet the criteria for the recommended amount of physical activity [18]. Physical exertion is significantly associated with life satisfaction, quality of life and feelings of happiness [19,20,21]. In addition, higher levels of physical activity are associated with delayed cognitive impairment and dementia [22,23]. Our study found that women were more likely than men to perform intense and moderate physical activities (p=0.046), (p=0.003) respectively. Furthermore, we observed that for the above levels of physical exertion, higher education was associated with more frequent activity (p=0.03), (p=0.002) respectively. This is also confirmed by other authors studying the behavior and habits of rural populations [24]. Interestingly, those with vocational education performed statistically more frequently (p=0.001) leisure time sedentary behavior compared to those with other education. In addition, leisure time sedentary behavior were also more frequently performed by women (p=0.049). In the study Azevedo M. et al. [25] found that higher socioeconomic status was positively correlated with exercise nevertheless, it was statistically more often performed by men. Also in the studies Biernat E. et al. [24] and Ignasiak Z. et al. [26] men were more likely to engage in physical activity than women. Different results were obtained by Wang J. et al. [27], in his work, the prevalence of sedentary lifestyles and low levels of physical activity characterized men with a high education. Nevertheless, the type of physical activity studied may influence the results of the work along with statistical relationships [28].

It is worthy observation that in our study, despite the fact that women performed intense, moderate physical activities and leisure time sedentary behavior more often, only in the case of moderate activities did they perform them summed longer. In addition, the summed time of walking for 60 minutes at a time was also performed longer by the female sex and was positively correlated with the level of education (p=0.001). Owino V. et al. [29] stresses that with age, muscle mass decreases, which can lead to an increased risk of falls. This is a particularly important issue because each year there are about 37.3 million falls requiring medical intervention, and the simplest method of prevention is sports [30]. In addition, in the meta-analysis Xu Q. et al. [31] it has been observed that falls are more common among older people with lower levels of education and who use stimulants such as alcohol or tobacco. Another interesting report is the paper of Bielemann R. et al. [32] which revealed that physical activity is inversely correlated with the phenomenon of polypragmasy. This is especially important in an era of increasing multimorbidity in the elderly, which can be counteracted to some extent by lifestyle changes. The problem will become increasingly acute, as the GUS forecasts predicts that in 2050 Poland’s population of people over 60 will increase compared to 2020 by 26.6% [33].

Our data indicates that the presence of hypertension among the subjects does not affect any physical activity. Similar results emerged in the research conducted by Iwai N. et al. [34], which reveals that the level of leisure-time physical activity was not associated with the use of antihypertensive drugs. Additionally, our analysis shows correlation between musculoskeletal pain and walking for 60 minutes at a time. Our study also found that the age of the respondents did not correlate with the frequency of physical activity. Contrary results were reported in several publications that also studied populations living in different regions of Poland in which physical activity decreased with age [15,16,26,35]. Obesity or overweight can be quite a hindrance to starting regular exercise. Confirmation comes from studies showing that people with higher BMIs are less likely to do physical activity [36,37]. In contrast, in our study, we did not observe a statistically significant relationship between BMI and any level of physical activity.

Conclusions

The study assessed the level of physical activity in the perspective of chronic diseases in a rural Polish population. The frequency of performing intense and moderate physical activity at the level of 34.6% and 52.3% respectively, is objectively insufficient. Nevertheless, the results indicate that women are more likely than men to implement physical activity into their daily lives. We found that the incidence of musculoskeletal pain statistically significantly correlates with walking a minimum of 60 minutes at a time. Moreover, in the study population, hypertension had no impact on engaging in any physical activity. The research also proves an interesting phenomenon, namely that the BMI level is not related to the subjects’ exercise intake. Therefore, it is important for health care professionals especially nursing staff to impart medical knowledge and encourage changes in negative habits. This will not only improve nursing procedures, but also build a sense of responsibility for one’s health, which is extremely important in the therapeutic process.

References

1 

WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: at a glance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [access 10.04.2024]

2 

Blondell SJ, Hammersley-Mather R, Veerman JL. Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 27;14:510. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-510. PMid: 24885250; PMCID: PMC4064273.

3 

Pearce M, Garcia L, Abbas A, Strain T, Schuch FB, Golubic R, Kelly P, Khan S, Utukuri M, Laird Y, Mok A, Smith A, Tainio M, Brage S, Woodcock J. Association Between Physical Activity and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):550-559. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609. PMid: 35416941; PMCID: PMC9008579.

4 

Matei D, Trofin D, Iordan DA, Onu I, Condurache I, Ionite C, Buculei I. The Endocannabinoid System and Physical Exercise. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 19;24(3):1989. 10.3390/ijms24031989. PMid: 36768332; PMCID: PMC9916354.

5 

Ipsos | Global views on sport and exercise | July 2021 [access 10.04.2024]

6 

Lin LL, Liu CC. Effectiveness of Comprehensive Physical Activity Health Promotion Program on the Essential Physical Functions of Older Patients With Multiple Diseases and Dementia in Rural Area. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023 Jun 26;9:23337214231184127. 10.1177/23337214231184127. PMid: 37435006; PMCID: PMC10331075.

7 

Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO [dostęp 19.04.2024]

8 

Kohl HW 3rd. Physical activity and cardiovascular disease: evidence for a dose response. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6 Suppl):S472-83; discussion S493-4. 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00017. PMid: 11427773.

9 

Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Walker M. Changes in physical activity, mortality, and incidence of coronary heart disease in older men. Lancet. 1998 May 30;351(9116):1603-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)12355-8. PMid: 9620713.

10 

Laaksonen DE, Lindström J, Lakka TA, Eriksson JG, Niskanen L, Wikström K, Aunola S, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Valle TT, Ilanne-Parikka P, Louheranta A, Hämäläinen H, Rastas M, Salminen V, Cepaitis Z, Hakumäki M, Kaikkonen H, Härkönen P, Sundvall J, Tuomilehto J, Uusitupa M; Finnish diabetes prevention study. Physical activity in the prevention of type 2 diabetes: the Finnish diabetes prevention study. Diabetes. 2005 Jan;54(1):158-65. 10.2337/diabetes.54.1.158. PMid: 15616024.

11 

Rohan TE, Fu W, Hiller JE. Physical activity and survival from breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995 Oct;4(5):419-24. 10.1097/00008469-199510000-00010. PMid: 7496329.

13 

Bidzan-Bluma I, Lipowska M. Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning of Children: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 19;15(4):800. 10.3390/ijerph15040800. PMid: 29671803; PMCID: PMC5923842.

15 

Rowiński R, Kowalska G, Kozakiewicz M, Kędziora-Kornatowska K, Kornatowski M, Hawlena J, Rowińska K. Physical Activity and Its Determinants among Senior Residents of Podlasie, a Green Region of Poland, Based on the National PolSenior Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 14;18(20):10816. 10.3390/ijerph182010816. PMid: 34682562; PMCID: PMC8535249.

16 

Biernat E, Bartkiewicz P, Buchholtz S. Are Structural Changes in Polish Rural Areas Fostering Leisure-Time Physical Activity? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 1;14(4):372. 10.3390/ijerph14040372. PMid: 28368322; PMCID: PMC5409573.

17 

Fennell, Curtis, Jacob E. Barkley, and Andrew Lepp. “The relationship between cell phone use, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adults aged 18–80.” Computers in human Behavior 90 (2019): 53-59.

18 

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077-e86.

19 

An HY, Chen W, Wang CW, Yang HF, Huang WT, Fan SY. The Relationships between Physical Activity and Life Satisfaction and Happiness among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 4;17(13):4817. 10.3390/ijerph17134817. PMid: 32635457; PMCID: PMC7369812.

20 

Ćwirlej-Sozańska A. (2014). Aktywność fizyczna a stan zdrowia osób starszych. Medical Review, (2), 173-181.

21 

Vagetti GC, Barbosa Filho VC, Moreira NB, Oliveira Vd, Mazzardo O, Campos Wd. Association between physical activity and quality of life in the elderly: a systematic review, 2000-2012. Braz J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan-Mar;36(1):76-88. 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0895. Epub 2014 Jan 17. PMid: 24554274.

22 

Blondell SJ, Hammersley-Mather R, Veerman JL. Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 27;14:510. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-510. PMid: 24885250; PMCID: PMC4064273.

23 

Hemmeter UM, Ngamsri T. Körperliche Aktivität und psychische Gesundheit: Fokus Alter [Physical Activity and Mental Health in the Elderly]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2022;110(4):193-198. German. 10.1024/1661-8157/a003853. PMid: 35291872.

24 

Biernat E, Piątkowska M. Leisure-Time Physical Activity Participation Trends 2014-2018: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):208. 10.3390/ijerph17010208. PMid: 31892204; PMCID: PMC6982099.

25 

Azevedo MR, Araújo CL, Reichert FF, Siqueira FV, da Silva MC, Hallal PC. Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity. Int J Public Health. 2007;52(1):8-15. 10.1007/s00038-006-5062-1. PMid: 17966815; PMCID: PMC2778720.

26 

Ignasiak Z, Sławińska T, Dabrowski A, Rowiński R. The structure of physical activity in seniors from lower Silesia. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2013;64(1):67-73. PMid: 23789316.

27 

Wang J, Wang Y, Korivi M, Chen X, Zhu R. Status of Sedentary Time and Physical Activity of Rural Residents: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study in Eastern China. Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:838226. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838226. PMid: 35493367; PMCID: PMC9047957.

28 

Stalsberg R, Pedersen AV. Are Differences in Physical Activity across Socioeconomic Groups Associated with Choice of Physical Activity Variables to Report? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 5;15(5):922. 10.3390/ijerph15050922. PMid: 29734745; PMCID: PMC5981961.

29 

Owino V, Yang SY, Goldspink G. Age-related loss of skeletal muscle function and the inability to express the autocrine form of insulin-like growth factor-1 (MGF) in response to mechanical overload. FEBS Lett. 2001 Sep 14;505(2):259-63. 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02825-3. PMid: 11566187.

30 

WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. Step safely: strategies for preventing and managing falls across the life-course.

31 

Xu Q, Ou X, Li J. The risk of falls among the aging population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:902599. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902599. PMid: 36324472; PMCID: PMC9618649.

32 

Bielemann RM, Silveira MPT, Lutz BH, Miranda VIA, Gonzalez MC, Brage S, Ekelund U, Bertoldi AD. Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Polypharmacy Among Brazilian Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2020 May 29;17(7):729-735. 10.1123/jpah.2019-0461. PMid: 32473590.

33 

GUS (2023), Sytuacja osób starszych w Polsce w 2022 roku, https://stat.gov.pl/obszarytematyczne/osoby-starsze/osoby-starsze/sytuacja-osob-starszych-w-polsce-w-2022-roku,2,5.html [dostęp: 12.04.2024].

34 

Iwai N, Yoshiike N, Saitoh S, Nose T, Kushiro T, Tanaka H. Leisure-time physical activity and related lifestyle characteristics among middle-aged Japanese. Japan Lifestyle Monitoring Study Group. J Epidemiol. 2000 Jul 10(4):226-33. 10.2188/jea.10.226. PMid: 10959604.

35 

Biernat E, Piątkowska M, Mynarski W. Prevalence and socioeconomic determinants of leisure time physical activity among Polish farmers. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018 Mar 14;25(1):151-156. 10.26444/aaem/75927. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PMid: 29575859.

36 

Zbrońska I, Mędrela-Kuder E. The level of physical activity in elderly persons with overweight and obesity. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2018;69(4):369-373. 10.32394/rpzh.2018.0042. PMid: 30525327.

37 

Riebe D, Blissmer BJ, Greaney ML, Garber CE, Lees FD, Clark PG. The relationship between obesity, physical activity, and physical function in older adults. J Aging Health. 2009 Dec;21(8):1159-78. 10.1177/0898264309350076. PMid: 19897781.

 
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.